↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GRP012-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:26:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  32   ~;  27   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(left_identity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(identity,VAR_0,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_identity) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    product(identity,A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_identity]) ).

fof(right_identity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(VAR_0,identity,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_identity) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    product(A,identity,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_identity]) ).

fof(left_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(inverse(VAR_0),VAR_0,identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_inverse) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    product(inverse(A),A,identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_inverse]) ).

fof(right_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(VAR_0,inverse(VAR_0),identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    product(A,inverse(A),identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_inverse]) ).

fof(total_function1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : product(VAR_0,VAR_1,multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',total_function1) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    product(A,B,multiply(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[total_function1]) ).

fof(total_function2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( VAR_2 = VAR_3
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_3)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',total_function2) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( C = D
    | ~ product(A,B,D)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[total_function2]) ).

fof(associativity1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] :
      ( product(VAR_0,VAR_4,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associativity1) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( product(A,E,F)
    | ~ product(C,D,F)
    | ~ product(B,D,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associativity1]) ).

fof(associativity2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] :
      ( product(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_4,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associativity2) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( product(C,D,F)
    | ~ product(A,E,F)
    | ~ product(B,D,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associativity2]) ).

fof(prove_inverse_of_product_is_product_of_inverses,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(a,b)) != multiply(inverse(b),inverse(a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_inverse_of_product_is_product_of_inverses) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    inverse(multiply(a,b)) != multiply(inverse(b),inverse(a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_inverse_of_product_is_product_of_inverses]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( multiply(A,B) = C
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    multiply(A,identity) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    ( product(multiply(D,A),B,E)
    | ~ product(D,C,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( product(multiply(A,C),inverse(C),B)
    | ~ product(A,identity,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    product(multiply(A,B),inverse(B),multiply(A,identity)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    product(multiply(A,B),inverse(B),A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_47]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    ( C = multiply(A,B)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    ~ product(inverse(b),inverse(a),inverse(multiply(a,b))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( product(C,inverse(B),D)
    | ~ product(A,identity,D)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( product(C,inverse(B),A)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ~ product(inverse(multiply(a,b)),a,inverse(b)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( product(inverse(A),C,D)
    | ~ product(identity,B,D)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( product(inverse(A),C,B)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ~ product(multiply(a,b),inverse(b),a),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_25]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP012-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 14:16:24 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 3344165 was started by sandbox2 on n004,
% 0.08/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 14:16:24 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.36  
% 0.08/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.08/0.38  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.08/0.38  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.08/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.08/0.38  % Given clauses 12.
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------