↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : GRP013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 10:08:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:13:40 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 9 --flip-ordering --complete-subsets --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 1 (squareness): product(X, X, identity) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 2 (right_identity): product(X, identity, X) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 3 (right_inverse): product(X, inverse(X), identity) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 4 (a_times_b_is_c): product(a, b, c) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 5 (inverse_a_times_inverse_b_is_d): product(inverse(a), inverse(b), d) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq2(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 8 (inverses_have_property): ifeq(product(inverse(X), inverse(Y), Z), true, product(X, Z, Y), true) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Axiom 9 (total_function2): ifeq2(product(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq2(product(X, Y, W), true, W, Z), Z) = Z.
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  Lemma 10: inverse(X) = X.
% 0.14/0.44  Proof:
% 0.14/0.44    inverse(X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    ifeq2(true, true, inverse(X), X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 8 (inverses_have_property) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    ifeq2(ifeq(product(inverse(X), inverse(inverse(X)), identity), true, product(X, identity, inverse(X)), true), true, inverse(X), X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 3 (right_inverse) }
% 0.14/0.44    ifeq2(ifeq(true, true, product(X, identity, inverse(X)), true), true, inverse(X), X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 6 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.14/0.44    ifeq2(product(X, identity, inverse(X)), true, inverse(X), X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    ifeq2(true, true, ifeq2(product(X, identity, inverse(X)), true, inverse(X), X), X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 2 (right_identity) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    ifeq2(product(X, identity, X), true, ifeq2(product(X, identity, inverse(X)), true, inverse(X), X), X)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 9 (total_function2) }
% 0.14/0.44    X
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  Goal 1 (prove_c_times_d_is_identity): product(c, d, identity) = true.
% 0.14/0.44  Proof:
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, d, identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 9 (total_function2) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, ifeq2(product(a, b, d), true, ifeq2(product(a, b, c), true, c, d), d), identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 4 (a_times_b_is_c) }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, ifeq2(product(a, b, d), true, ifeq2(true, true, c, d), d), identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, ifeq2(product(a, b, d), true, c, d), identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, ifeq2(product(a, inverse(b), d), true, c, d), identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, ifeq2(product(inverse(a), inverse(b), d), true, c, d), identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 5 (inverse_a_times_inverse_b_is_d) }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, ifeq2(true, true, c, d), identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 7 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.14/0.44    product(c, c, identity)
% 0.14/0.44  = { by axiom 1 (squareness) }
% 0.14/0.44    true
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------