%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:03:56 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.73s 0.92s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.73s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GRP014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.08/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 23:46:24 EDT 2022 % 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.15/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.15/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.15/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.15/0.39 # % 0.15/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.15/0.39 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2 % 0.15/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.15/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.15/0.39 # Hello from C++ % 0.48/0.64 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.48/0.64 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.48/0.64 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.48/0.64 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.48/0.64 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.48/0.64 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.48/0.64 # Found 2 unit axioms. % 0.48/0.64 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.48/0.64 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.48/0.64 # 2 unit axiom clauses % 0.48/0.64 % 0.48/0.64 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.48/0.64 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.48/0.64 # Creating equality axioms % 0.48/0.64 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.73/0.92 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.73/0.92 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.73/0.92 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.73/0.92 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.73/0.92 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.73/0.92 % 0.73/0.92 # End clausification derivation % 0.73/0.92 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),multiply(inverse(X1),X3))),X4),inverse(multiply(X2,X4)))))=X3)). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (multiply(multiply(a,b),c)!=multiply(a,multiply(b,c)))). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X5=X5)). % 0.73/0.92 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.73/0.92 # Begin printing tableau % 0.73/0.92 # Found 6 steps % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X22,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X23),multiply(inverse(X22),multiply(b,c)))),X24),inverse(multiply(X23,X24)))))=multiply(b,c)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (multiply(X22,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X23),multiply(inverse(X22),multiply(b,c)))),X24),inverse(multiply(X23,X24)))))=multiply(b,c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X28),multiply(inverse(X29),a))),X27),inverse(multiply(X28,X27)))))!=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (multiply(multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X28),multiply(inverse(X29),a))),X27),inverse(multiply(X28,X27))))),multiply(X22,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X23),multiply(inverse(X22),multiply(b,c)))),X24),inverse(multiply(X23,X24))))))=multiply(a,multiply(b,c))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (multiply(multiply(a,b),c)=multiply(a,multiply(b,c))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.73/0.92 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (multiply(multiply(a,b),c)!=multiply(multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X28),multiply(inverse(X29),a))),X27),inverse(multiply(X28,X27))))),multiply(X22,inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X23),multiply(inverse(X22),multiply(b,c)))),X24),inverse(multiply(X23,X24))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_32, ...])). % 0.73/0.92 # End printing tableau % 0.73/0.92 # SZS output end % 0.73/0.92 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.73/0.92 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.73/0.92 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on % 0.73/0.92 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.73/0.92 # Proof search is over... % 0.73/0.92 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------