%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : GRP019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 10:09:04 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output : Proof 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GRP019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:13:59 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44 Command-line arguments: --flatten-regeneralise
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.44 Axiom 1 (left_identity): product(identity, X, X) = true.
% 0.14/0.44 Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq2(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.14/0.44 Axiom 3 (total_function1): product(X, Y, multiply(X, Y)) = true.
% 0.14/0.44 Axiom 4 (total_function2): ifeq2(product(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq2(product(X, Y, W), true, W, Z), Z) = Z.
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 Goal 1 (prove_id_times_X_is_X): multiply(identity, a) = a.
% 0.14/0.44 Proof:
% 0.14/0.44 multiply(identity, a)
% 0.14/0.44 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44 ifeq2(true, true, multiply(identity, a), a)
% 0.14/0.44 = { by axiom 3 (total_function1) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44 ifeq2(product(identity, a, multiply(identity, a)), true, multiply(identity, a), a)
% 0.14/0.44 = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44 ifeq2(true, true, ifeq2(product(identity, a, multiply(identity, a)), true, multiply(identity, a), a), a)
% 0.14/0.44 = { by axiom 1 (left_identity) R->L }
% 0.14/0.44 ifeq2(product(identity, a, a), true, ifeq2(product(identity, a, multiply(identity, a)), true, multiply(identity, a), a), a)
% 0.14/0.44 = { by axiom 4 (total_function2) }
% 0.14/0.44 a
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------