↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP028-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7ueP1ujllz true

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:35:27 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.25s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : GRP028-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7ueP1ujllz true
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:18:38 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.31  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.31  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.31  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.31  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.31  % Running in FO mode
% 0.16/0.56  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.16/0.56  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.16/0.56  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.90/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.90/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.90/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.90/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.90/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.90/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.90/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.25/0.70  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.25/0.70  % BCE start: 4
% 1.25/0.70  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.25/0.70  % PE start: 4
% 1.25/0.70  logic: neq
% 1.25/0.70  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.25/0.70  % done 7 iterations in 0.013s
% 1.25/0.70  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.25/0.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.25/0.70  thf(product_type, type, product: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(right_solution_type, type, right_solution: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(left_solution_type, type, left_solution: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(not_identity_type, type, not_identity: $i > $i).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(right_soln, axiom, (product @ X @ ( right_solution @ X @ Y ) @ Y)).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ (right_solution @ X0 @ X1) @ X1)),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [right_soln])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(left_soln, axiom, (product @ ( left_solution @ X @ Y ) @ X @ Y)).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (product @ (left_solution @ X0 @ X1) @ X0 @ X1)),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_soln])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(associativity, axiom,
% 1.25/0.70    (( ~( product @ X @ Y @ U ) ) | ( ~( product @ Y @ Z @ V ) ) | 
% 1.25/0.70     ( ~( product @ X @ V @ W ) ) | ( product @ U @ Z @ W ))).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 1.25/0.70         (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 1.25/0.70          | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X4)
% 1.25/0.70          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X4 @ X5)
% 1.25/0.70          |  (product @ X2 @ X3 @ X5))),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.25/0.70         ( (product @ X0 @ X3 @ X0)
% 1.25/0.70          | ~ (product @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 1.25/0.70          | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.25/0.70         ( (product @ X0 @ X2 @ X0) | ~ (product @ X1 @ X2 @ X1))),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (product @ X1 @ (right_solution @ X0 @ X0) @ X1)),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(prove_there_is_a_right_identity, conjecture,
% 1.25/0.70    (product @ ( not_identity @ X ) @ X @ ( not_identity @ X ))).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.25/0.70    (~( product @ ( not_identity @ X ) @ X @ ( not_identity @ X ) )),
% 1.25/0.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_there_is_a_right_identity])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.25/0.70      (![X0 : $i]: ~ (product @ (not_identity @ X0) @ X0 @ (not_identity @ X0))),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.25/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, ($false),
% 1.25/0.70      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 1.25/0.70  
% 1.25/0.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.25/0.70  
% 1.25/0.70  
% 1.25/0.70  % Terminating...
% 1.58/0.78  % Runner terminated.
% 1.58/0.79  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------