↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GRP028-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:38:32 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : GRP028-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 08:57:53 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.47  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.58  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.50/0.58  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.58  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.50/0.58  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.50/0.58  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  % Result      :Theorem 0.080000s
% 0.50/0.58  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.080000s
% 0.50/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.58  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.58  % File     : GRP028-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.50/0.58  % Domain   : Group Theory (Semigroups)
% 0.50/0.58  % Problem  : In semigroups, left and right solutions => right id exists
% 0.50/0.58  % Version  : [MOW76] axioms.
% 0.50/0.58  % English  : If there are left and right solutions, then there is a right
% 0.50/0.58  %            identity element.
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  % Refs     : [MOW76] McCharen et al. (1976), Problems and Experiments for a
% 0.50/0.58  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.50/0.58  % Names    :
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.58  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.11 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.12 v5.1.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.50/0.58  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
% 0.50/0.58  %            Number of literals    :   15 (   1 equ;   9 neg)
% 0.50/0.58  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.50/0.58  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.50/0.58  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.50/0.58  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.58  %            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn)
% 0.50/0.58  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.50/0.58  
% 0.50/0.58  % Comments :
% 0.50/0.58  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.58  %----Include Semigroup axioms
% 0.50/0.58  include('Axioms/GRP002-0.ax').
% 0.50/0.58  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(left_soln,hypothesis,
% 0.50/0.59      product(left_solution(X,Y),X,Y) ).
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(right_soln,hypothesis,
% 0.50/0.59      product(X,right_solution(X,Y),Y) ).
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  %----There is an element for which no X is identity
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(prove_there_is_a_right_identity,negated_conjecture,
% 0.50/0.59      ~ product(not_identity(X),X,not_identity(X)) ).
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.50/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.59  %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:13)
% 0.50/0.59  %VarNum:47(SingletonVarNum:23)
% 0.50/0.59  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.50/0.59  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.50/0.59  %SharedTerms:0
% 0.50/0.59  %goalClause: 17
% 0.50/0.59  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.50/0.59  [17]~P1(f4(x171),x171,f4(x171))
% 0.50/0.59  [14]P1(x141,x142,f1(x141,x142))
% 0.50/0.59  [15]P1(x151,f3(x151,x152),x152)
% 0.50/0.59  [16]P1(f2(x161,x162),x161,x162)
% 0.50/0.59  [18]~P1(x183,x184,x181)+E(x181,x182)+~P1(x183,x184,x182)
% 0.50/0.59  [19]~P1(x196,x194,x191)+P1(x191,x192,x193)+~P1(x194,x192,x195)+~P1(x196,x195,x193)
% 0.50/0.59  [20]~P1(x201,x206,x204)+P1(x201,x202,x203)+~P1(x204,x205,x203)+~P1(x206,x205,x202)
% 0.50/0.59  %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.59  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.50/0.59  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.50/0.59  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.50/0.59  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 0.50/0.59  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 0.50/0.59  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 0.50/0.59  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 0.50/0.59  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f2(x81,x83),f2(x82,x83))
% 0.50/0.59  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f2(x93,x91),f2(x93,x92))
% 0.50/0.59  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x101),f4(x102))
% 0.50/0.59  [11]P1(x112,x113,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P1(x111,x113,x114)
% 0.50/0.59  [12]P1(x123,x122,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x121,x124)
% 0.50/0.59  [13]P1(x133,x134,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x134,x131)
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(x241,f3(x241,x242),x242)),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[15])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(x251,x252,f1(x251,x252))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(x281,f3(x281,x282),x282)),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[15])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(x301,x302,f1(x301,x302))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(f1(x311,x312),f3(x312,x312),f1(x311,x312))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,25,30,15,24,28,16,11,18,12,13,19])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(f1(x451,x452),f3(f3(x452,x452),f3(x452,x452)),f1(x451,x452))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[31,14,15,18,19])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(106,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     ($false),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,17,45,19]),
% 0.50/0.59     ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.59  % Total time :0.080000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------