↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP028-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SDFcuoPj8e true

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:35:28 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GRP028-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SDFcuoPj8e true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:25:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.77  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.77  % BCE start: 7
% 0.56/0.77  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.77  % PE start: 7
% 0.56/0.77  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.77  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.77  % done 26 iterations in 0.017s
% 0.56/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.77  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.77  thf(product_type, type, product: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(right_solution_type, type, right_solution: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(left_solution_type, type, left_solution: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(not_identity_type, type, not_identity: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(right_soln, axiom, (product @ X @ ( right_solution @ X @ Y ) @ Y)).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ (right_solution @ X0 @ X1) @ X1)),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [right_soln])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(left_soln, axiom, (product @ ( left_solution @ X @ Y ) @ X @ Y)).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (product @ (left_solution @ X0 @ X1) @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_soln])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(associativity2, axiom,
% 0.56/0.77    (( ~( product @ X @ Y @ U ) ) | ( ~( product @ Y @ Z @ V ) ) | 
% 0.56/0.77     ( ~( product @ X @ V @ W ) ) | ( product @ U @ Z @ W ))).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.77         (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.56/0.77          | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X4)
% 0.56/0.77          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X4 @ X5)
% 0.56/0.77          |  (product @ X2 @ X3 @ X5))),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity2])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.77         ( (product @ X0 @ X3 @ X0)
% 0.56/0.77          | ~ (product @ X2 @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.56/0.77          | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl86, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.77         (~ (product @ X1 @ X2 @ X1) |  (product @ X0 @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl56])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (product @ X1 @ (right_solution @ X0 @ X0) @ X1)),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl86])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(prove_there_is_a_right_identity, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.77    (product @ ( not_identity @ X ) @ X @ ( not_identity @ X ))).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.77    (~( product @ ( not_identity @ X ) @ X @ ( not_identity @ X ) )),
% 0.56/0.77    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_there_is_a_right_identity])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.77      (![X0 : $i]: ~ (product @ (not_identity @ X0) @ X0 @ (not_identity @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl102, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.77      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl89, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.56/0.77  
% 0.56/0.77  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.77  
% 0.56/0.77  
% 0.56/0.77  % Terminating...
% 0.62/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 0.62/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------