↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP035-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   76 (   7 equ;  40 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity1,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X3,X4,X6)
    | ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X1,X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',associativity1) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    product(identity,X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(total_function2,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',total_function2) ).

cnf(right_inverse,axiom,
    product(X1,inverse(X1),identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',right_inverse) ).

cnf(right_identity,axiom,
    product(X1,identity,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',right_identity) ).

cnf(closure_of_product_and_inverse,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,inverse(X2),X3)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X2)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X1)
    | subgroup_member(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-2.ax',closure_of_product_and_inverse) ).

cnf(total_function1,axiom,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP003-0.ax',total_function1) ).

cnf(b_is_in_subgroup,hypothesis,
    subgroup_member(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_in_subgroup) ).

cnf(prove_c_is_in_subgroup,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subgroup_member(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_c_is_in_subgroup) ).

cnf(a_times_b_is_c,hypothesis,
    product(a,b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_times_b_is_c) ).

cnf(a_is_in_subgroup,hypothesis,
    subgroup_member(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_in_subgroup) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ product(X3,X4,X6)
    | ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X1,X5,X6) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ product(X3,X4,X6)
    | ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X1,X5,X6) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    product(identity,X1,X1),
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[total_function2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ product(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,identity)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    product(X1,inverse(X1),identity),
    right_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    product(X1,identity,X1),
    right_identity ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,inverse(X2),X3)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X2)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X1)
    | subgroup_member(X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[closure_of_product_and_inverse]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    total_function1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ product(inverse(X1),X3,X2)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ product(X2,identity,X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,inverse(X2),X3)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X2)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X1)
    | subgroup_member(X3) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ product(X2,X3,X1)
    | X1 = multiply(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    product(X1,identity,inverse(inverse(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ subgroup_member(X1)
    | subgroup_member(identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    subgroup_member(b),
    b_is_in_subgroup ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    subgroup_member(identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ product(X3,X2,X1)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X3)
    | ~ subgroup_member(inverse(X2))
    | subgroup_member(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ subgroup_member(X1)
    | subgroup_member(inverse(X1)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_13]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subgroup_member(c),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_c_is_in_subgroup]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ product(X2,X3,X1)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X3)
    | ~ subgroup_member(X2)
    | subgroup_member(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    product(a,b,c),
    a_times_b_is_c ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    subgroup_member(a),
    a_is_in_subgroup ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subgroup_member(c),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_28])]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP035-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 19:56:04 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1083408 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.41  % Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1083413 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.41  % Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.41  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.13/0.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.13/0.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.13/0.41  % Processed clauses                    : 70
% 0.13/0.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.13/0.41  % ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.13/0.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 59
% 0.13/0.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.13/0.41  % Generated clauses                    : 141
% 0.13/0.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 81
% 0.13/0.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Paramodulations                      : 141
% 0.13/0.41  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 80
% 0.13/0.41  % ...of those cached                   : 61
% 0.13/0.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 0.13/0.41  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.13/0.41  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.41  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.13/0.41  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
% 0.13/0.41  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 0.13/0.41  % ...number of literals in the above   : 79
% 0.13/0.41  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.13/0.41  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 168
% 0.13/0.41  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 144
% 0.13/0.41  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.13/0.41  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 21
% 0.13/0.41  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.13/0.41  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.41  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1690
% 0.13/0.41  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 27
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.41  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.41  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.13/0.41  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.41  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.13/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------