%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP035-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:05 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.38s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.13 % Problem : GRP035-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.08/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 01:09:09 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d % 0.14/0.38 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. % 0.14/0.38 # % 0.14/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.14/0.38 # Number of axioms: 13 Number of unprocessed: 13 % 0.14/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.38 # 13 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.14/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.38 # Found 9 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.38 # 4 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.38 # 9 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.38 % 0.14/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.38 % 0.14/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, hypothesis, (subgroup_member(a))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, hypothesis, (subgroup_member(b))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, hypothesis, (product(a,b,c))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (product(X1,identity,X1))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (product(identity,X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (product(X1,inverse(X1),identity))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (product(inverse(X1),X1,identity))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~subgroup_member(c))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (subgroup_member(X1)|~subgroup_member(X2)|~subgroup_member(X3)|~product(X3,inverse(X2),X1))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (X1=X2|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X1,X6,X4))). % 0.14/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.38 # Found 8 steps % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~subgroup_member(c)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~subgroup_member(c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~subgroup_member(a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~subgroup_member(a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~product(a,inverse(a),c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~product(a,b,c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (~product(a,identity,a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (~product(identity,b,inverse(a))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_56, ...])). % 0.14/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.38 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.38 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on % 0.14/0.38 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.14/0.38 # Proof search is over... % 0.14/0.38 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------