↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : GRP044-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 10:09:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.53s
% Output   : Proof 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP044-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:31 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.53  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.15/0.53  
% 0.15/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.53  
% 0.15/0.53  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.15/0.53  Axiom 1 (a_equals_b): equalish(a, b) = true.
% 0.15/0.53  Axiom 2 (left_identity): product(identity, X, X) = true.
% 0.15/0.53  Axiom 3 (product_with_a): product(a, c, result) = true.
% 0.15/0.53  Axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.15/0.53  Axiom 5 (product_substitution3): ifeq(equalish(X, Y), true, ifeq(product(Z, W, X), true, product(Z, W, Y), true), true) = true.
% 0.15/0.53  Axiom 6 (associativity2): ifeq(product(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq(product(W, Z, V), true, ifeq(product(W, X, U), true, product(U, Y, V), true), true), true) = true.
% 0.15/0.53  
% 0.15/0.53  Goal 1 (prove_product_with_b): product(b, c, result) = true.
% 0.15/0.53  Proof:
% 0.15/0.53    product(b, c, result)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(true, true, product(b, c, result), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 5 (product_substitution3) R->L }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(a, b), true, ifeq(product(identity, a, a), true, product(identity, a, b), true), true), true, product(b, c, result), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (left_identity) }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(a, b), true, ifeq(true, true, product(identity, a, b), true), true), true, product(b, c, result), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(a, b), true, product(identity, a, b), true), true, product(b, c, result), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (a_equals_b) }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, product(identity, a, b), true), true, product(b, c, result), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(product(identity, a, b), true, product(b, c, result), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(true, true, ifeq(product(identity, a, b), true, product(b, c, result), true), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 3 (product_with_a) R->L }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(product(a, c, result), true, ifeq(product(identity, a, b), true, product(b, c, result), true), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(product(a, c, result), true, ifeq(true, true, ifeq(product(identity, a, b), true, product(b, c, result), true), true), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (left_identity) R->L }
% 0.15/0.53    ifeq(product(a, c, result), true, ifeq(product(identity, result, result), true, ifeq(product(identity, a, b), true, product(b, c, result), true), true), true)
% 0.15/0.53  = { by axiom 6 (associativity2) }
% 0.15/0.53    true
% 0.15/0.53  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.15/0.53  
% 0.15/0.53  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------