%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:12 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 74.10s 74.29s % Output : CNFRefutation 74.10s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GRP052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 04:21:37 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.19/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.19/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.19/0.36 # % 0.19/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.19/0.36 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2 % 0.19/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.19/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.19/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 70.55/70.74 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 70.55/70.74 # Local unification is enabled... % 70.55/70.74 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 70.55/70.74 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 70.55/70.74 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 70.55/70.74 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 70.55/70.74 # Found 1 unit axioms. % 70.55/70.74 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 70.55/70.74 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses % 70.55/70.74 # 1 unit axiom clauses % 70.55/70.74 % 70.55/70.74 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 70.55/70.74 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 70.55/70.74 # Creating equality axioms % 70.55/70.74 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 74.10/74.29 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 74.10/74.29 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 74.10/74.29 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 74.10/74.29 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 74.10/74.29 # Begin clausification derivation % 74.10/74.29 % 74.10/74.29 # End clausification derivation % 74.10/74.29 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))),X3))),X2)))=X3)). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))|multiply(inverse(a1),a1)!=multiply(inverse(b1),b1)|multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)!=a2)). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (X4=X4)). % 74.10/74.29 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 74.10/74.29 # Begin printing tableau % 74.10/74.29 # Found 6 steps % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10)))=inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))), inference(start_rule)). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10)))=inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (multiply(X17,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X14),X14),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X17,inverse(X14))),X13))),X14)))!=X13), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (multiply(multiply(X17,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X14),X14),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X17,inverse(X14))),X13))),X14))),multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10))))=multiply(X13,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (multiply(X13,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2)))!=X9), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). % 74.10/74.29 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (multiply(multiply(X17,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X14),X14),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X17,inverse(X14))),X13))),X14))),multiply(X11,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X10),X10),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X11,inverse(X10))),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),X2),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X13,inverse(X2))),X9))),X2))))),X10))))=X9), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_50, ...])). % 74.10/74.29 # End printing tableau % 74.10/74.29 # SZS output end % 74.10/74.29 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 74.10/74.29 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 74.10/74.29 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on % 74.10/74.29 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 74.10/74.29 # Proof search is over... % 74.10/74.29 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------