%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GRP065-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:37:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 10.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 32 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 42 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
| multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
inverse ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
divide(inverse(divide(X1,X1)),X2) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
divide(X1,inverse(X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
divide(inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(inverse(X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X1,X1))),X2) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,X1),X2) = inverse(inverse(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
divide(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,X2))),X2) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
multiply(divide(X1,X1),X2) = multiply(divide(X3,X3),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = divide(X2,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
multiply(inverse(divide(X1,X1)),X2) = inverse(inverse(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
multiply(inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(X3,X3)))),X1) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
inverse(inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,divide(X2,X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_4]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),c_0_4]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
divide(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
multiply(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),X1) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
| multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
divide(X1,X1) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
multiply(inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
inverse(divide(X1,X2)) = divide(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
| multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
| multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = inverse(inverse(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
multiply(divide(divide(X1,multiply(inverse(X2),X3)),X2),X3) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( inverse(inverse(a2)) != a2
| multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
multiply(multiply(divide(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),X2),X3) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GRP065-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/10.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 19:56:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/10.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/10.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % new_bool_3 with pid 31462 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/10.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/10.47 % Search class: FUHPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 31467 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/10.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/10.47 % Search class: FUHPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/10.47
% 0.15/10.47 % Proof found!
% 0.15/10.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/10.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/10.47 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.15/10.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.15/10.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.15/10.47 % Processed clauses : 885
% 0.15/10.47 % ...of these trivial : 135
% 0.15/10.47 % ...subsumed : 635
% 0.15/10.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 115
% 0.15/10.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/10.47 % Backward-rewritten : 84
% 0.15/10.47 % Generated clauses : 5848
% 0.15/10.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4715
% 0.15/10.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Paramodulations : 5848
% 0.15/10.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Total rewrite steps : 4118
% 0.15/10.47 % ...of those cached : 3087
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 0.15/10.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.15/10.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.15/10.47 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 302
% 0.15/10.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 302
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 85
% 0.15/10.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 102
% 0.15/10.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 541
% 0.15/10.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 611
% 0.15/10.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 143
% 0.15/10.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52519
% 0.15/10.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.15/10.47
% 0.15/10.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.47 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/10.47 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.15/10.47
% 0.15/10.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.47 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.15/10.47 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/10.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------