↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : GRP088-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 10:09:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.46s
% Output   : Proof 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP088-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:20:25 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.46  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.49  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.09/0.49  Axiom 1 (inverse): inverse(X) = divide(divide(Y, Y), X).
% 0.09/0.49  Axiom 2 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = divide(X, divide(divide(Z, Z), Y)).
% 0.09/0.49  Axiom 3 (single_axiom): divide(X, divide(Y, divide(Z, divide(X, Y)))) = Z.
% 0.09/0.49  
% 0.09/0.49  Lemma 4: inverse(divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(X)))) = Y.
% 0.09/0.49  Proof:
% 0.09/0.49    inverse(divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(X))))
% 0.09/0.49  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.09/0.49    inverse(divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(Z, Z), X))))
% 0.09/0.49  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.09/0.49    divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(Z, Z), X))))
% 0.09/0.49  = { by axiom 3 (single_axiom) }
% 0.09/0.49    Y
% 0.09/0.49  
% 0.09/0.49  Lemma 5: divide(Y, Y) = divide(X, X).
% 0.09/0.49  Proof:
% 0.09/0.49    divide(Y, Y)
% 0.09/0.49  = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.09/0.49    inverse(divide(Z, divide(divide(Y, Y), inverse(Z))))
% 0.09/0.49  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.09/0.49    inverse(divide(Z, inverse(inverse(Z))))
% 0.54/0.49  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.54/0.49    inverse(divide(Z, divide(divide(X, X), inverse(Z))))
% 0.54/0.49  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, X)
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 6: multiply(X, Y) = divide(X, inverse(Y)).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    multiply(X, Y)
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 2 (multiply) }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(divide(Z, Z), Y))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 7: inverse(divide(X, divide(Y, Y))) = inverse(X).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(X, divide(Y, Y)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(X, divide(inverse(X), inverse(X))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(X)
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 8: divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(divide(X, Y)))) = divide(Z, Z).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(divide(X, Y))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(X, Y))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 3 (single_axiom) }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(Z, Z)
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 9: inverse(inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(inverse(X), divide(Y, Y)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(inverse(X), divide(X, divide(divide(Z, Z), inverse(divide(X, divide(Z, Z)))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(inverse(X), divide(X, inverse(inverse(divide(X, divide(Z, Z)))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(inverse(X), divide(X, inverse(inverse(X)))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.54/0.50    X
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 10: divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(X))) = inverse(Y).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(X)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(inverse(divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(X)))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(Y)
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 11: divide(divide(X, Y), X) = inverse(Y).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), X)
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 3 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(Y, divide(inverse(divide(Z, Z)), inverse(divide(Y, inverse(divide(Z, Z))))))))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), inverse(divide(Y, inverse(divide(Z, Z))))))))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(Y, inverse(inverse(divide(Y, inverse(divide(Z, Z))))))))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(Y, divide(Y, inverse(divide(Z, Z))))))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(Y, divide(Y, divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))))))))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 3 (single_axiom) }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z)), divide(divide(Z, Z), divide(Z, Z))), divide(X, Y))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), divide(Y, inverse(divide(X, Y))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(Y)
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 12: divide(divide(X, Y), Z) = divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(Z))).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    divide(divide(X, Y), Z)
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 3 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(X, Y), Z), divide(X, Y))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(Y, inverse(Z)))
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 13: inverse(divide(X, inverse(Y))) = divide(inverse(X), Y).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(X, inverse(Y)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(X, divide(divide(inverse(X), Y), inverse(X))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(inverse(X), Y)
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Lemma 14: inverse(divide(inverse(X), Y)) = divide(X, inverse(Y)).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    inverse(divide(inverse(X), Y))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, divide(divide(inverse(X), Y), inverse(X)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.54/0.50    divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms): tuple(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4)) = tuple(a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)), multiply(inverse(b1), b1), multiply(b4, a4)).
% 0.54/0.50  Proof:
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(multiply(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(divide(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(a2)), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(inverse(inverse(a2)), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(inverse(inverse(a2)), multiply(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), c3), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(inverse(inverse(a2)), divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(inverse(inverse(a2)), divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(inverse(inverse(a2)), divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(c3)))), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), inverse(divide(inverse(a4), b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), inverse(divide(divide(divide(b4, b4), a4), b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), inverse(divide(divide(b4, divide(b4, inverse(a4))), b4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), inverse(inverse(divide(b4, inverse(a4)))))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), inverse(divide(inverse(b4), a4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), multiply(inverse(b1), b1), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, multiply(a3, divide(b3, inverse(c3))), multiply(inverse(b1), b1), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.54/0.50  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.54/0.50    tuple(a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)), multiply(inverse(b1), b1), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.54/0.50  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.50  
% 0.54/0.50  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------