↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:36:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  37 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(divide(X,divide(Y,Z)),divide(X,Y)) = Z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X,Y) = divide(X,divide(divide(Z,Z),Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    inverse(X) = divide(divide(Y,Y),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1)
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = divide(X,inverse(Y)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[multiply,inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    ( divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1))
    | inverse(inverse(a2)) != a2
    | divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3))))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms,inverse,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(X,Y),X)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[inverse,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(9,plain,
    divide(X,divide(divide(Y,divide(Z,X)),Y)) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X,Y)),inverse(X)) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,inverse,theory(equality)]),inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ( divide(inverse(a1),inverse(a1)) != divide(inverse(b1),inverse(b1))
    | divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3))))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    inverse(X) = divide(divide(Y,X),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[14,8,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(divide(Y,X))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[9,18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    divide(X,X) = divide(Y,Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[19,inverse,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3))))
    | divide(a4,inverse(b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[15,20,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    divide(X,divide(Y,Y)) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[inverse,19,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),divide(X,Z)) = inverse(divide(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,19,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),inverse(Y)) = inverse(divide(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[19,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    divide(X,inverse(Y)) = inverse(divide(inverse(X),Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ( inverse(divide(divide(inverse(a3),b3),c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(b3),c3))
    | inverse(divide(inverse(a4),b4)) != divide(b4,inverse(a4)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[21,14,27,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = inverse(divide(X,inverse(Y))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    inverse(divide(X,Y)) = divide(Y,X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[22,23,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    divide(inverse(X),Y) = divide(inverse(Y),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[32,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    divide(divide(X,Y),divide(X,Z)) = divide(Z,Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[23,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(40,plain,
    divide(c3,divide(inverse(a3),b3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(b3),c3)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[31,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(41,plain,
    X = divide(Y,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,18,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(48,plain,
    divide(X,divide(Y,Z)) = divide(Z,divide(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[38,41,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(49,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[40,36,48,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : GRP090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 02:20:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T02:20:09
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T02:20:09
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  #||
% 0.20/0.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54  ||#
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.54  ;       393 formulas have been input or derived (from 29 formulas).
% 0.20/0.54  ;        49 (12%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.20/0.54  ;           28 (57%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.54  ;           21 (43%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.54  ; 
% 0.20/0.54  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.002   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.010  17%   Process new row              (362 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.003   5%   Resolution                   (56 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.007  12%   Paramodulation               (28 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.001   2%   Backward subsumption         (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.006  10%   Forward simplification       (316 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.002   3%   Backward simplification      (49 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.004   7%   Ordering                     (738 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.024  41%   Other
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.059        Total
% 0.20/0.54  ;     0.064        Real time
% 0.20/0.54  ; 
% 0.20/0.54  ; Term-hash-array has 162 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.54  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (1 at peak, 5 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (36 at peak, 143 added, 142 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 5 calls.
% 0.20/0.54  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 5 calls.
% 0.20/0.54  ; Path-index has 63 entries (79 at peak, 254 added, 191 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54  ; Path-index has 209 nodes (265 at peak, 502 added, 293 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54  ; Trie-index has 63 entries (79 at peak, 254 added, 191 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54  ; Trie-index has 191 nodes (266 at peak, 733 added, 542 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54  ; Retrieved 686 generalization terms in 1,542 calls.
% 0.20/0.54  ; Retrieved 161 instance terms in 51 calls.
% 0.20/0.54  ; Retrieved 757 unifiable terms in 237 calls.
% 0.20/0.54  ; 
% 0.20/0.54  ; The agenda of rows to process has 16 entries:
% 0.20/0.54  ;     2 with value 19              8 with value 21               2 with value 22
% 0.20/0.54  ;     4 with value 20
% 0.20/0.54  ; The agenda of rows to give has 8 entries:
% 0.20/0.54  ;     2 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 21)
% 0.20/0.54  Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.54    0.064 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.54    0.051658 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.54    0.01179 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.54    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.54    0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.54    5,191,576 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.54  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.54  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T02:20:09
% 0.20/0.54  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.54  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------