↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP094-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:30:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.03s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   70 (  61 unt;  13 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  187 (  91 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  32   ~;  22   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;  14 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  39   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : divide(divide(identity,divide(X0,X1)),divide(divide(X1,X2),X0)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : multiply(X0,X1) = divide(X0,divide(identity,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : inverse(X0) = divide(identity,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : identity = divide(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4)
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4)
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | a2 != multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( divide(a4,divide(identity,b4)) != divide(b4,divide(identity,a4))
    | divide(divide(a3,divide(identity,b3)),divide(identity,c3)) != divide(a3,divide(identity,divide(b3,divide(identity,c3))))
    | a2 != divide(divide(divide(identity,b2),divide(identity,b2)),divide(identity,a2))
    | divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)) != divide(divide(identity,b1),divide(identity,b1)) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f6,f2,f3,f2,f3,f2,f2,f3,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : divide(divide(identity,divide(X0,X1)),divide(divide(X1,X2),X0)) = X2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,X0) = identity,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( divide(a4,divide(identity,b4)) != divide(b4,divide(identity,a4)) )
    | ( divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)) != divide(divide(identity,b1),divide(identity,b1)) )
    | ( divide(divide(a3,divide(identity,b3)),divide(identity,c3)) != divide(a3,divide(identity,divide(b3,divide(identity,c3)))) )
    | ( divide(divide(divide(identity,b2),divide(identity,b2)),divide(identity,a2)) != a2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ( ( identity != identity )
    | ( divide(a4,divide(identity,b4)) != divide(b4,divide(identity,a4)) )
    | ( divide(identity,divide(identity,a2)) != a2 )
    | ( divide(divide(a3,divide(identity,b3)),divide(identity,c3)) != divide(a3,divide(identity,divide(b3,divide(identity,c3)))) ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ( ( divide(a4,divide(identity,b4)) != divide(b4,divide(identity,a4)) )
    | ( divide(identity,divide(identity,a2)) != a2 )
    | ( divide(divide(a3,divide(identity,b3)),divide(identity,c3)) != divide(a3,divide(identity,divide(b3,divide(identity,c3)))) ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_79,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = divide(identity,b3),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_80,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = divide(a3,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_81,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = divide(identity,c3),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_82,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = divide(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_83,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = divide(b3,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_84,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = divide(identity,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_85,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = divide(a3,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_86,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = divide(identity,a2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_87,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = divide(identity,iPr_def_17),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_88,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = divide(identity,b4),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_89,definition,
    iPr_def_20 = divide(a4,iPr_def_19),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_20])],[]) ).

tcf(c_90,definition,
    iPr_def_21 = divide(identity,a4),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_21])],[]) ).

tcf(c_91,definition,
    iPr_def_22 = divide(b4,iPr_def_21),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_22])],[]) ).

tcf(c_92,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_20 != iPr_def_22 )
    | ( iPr_def_18 != a2 )
    | ( iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_16 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_90,c_91,c_88,c_89,c_86,c_87,c_83,c_84,c_85,c_81,c_79,c_80,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(divide(identity,identity),divide(divide(X0,X1),X0)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(identity,iPr_def_21),divide(divide(a4,X0),identity)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_160,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(identity,iPr_def_14),divide(divide(iPr_def_12,X0),b3)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_186,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(iPr_def_15,divide(divide(iPr_def_12,X0),b3)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_250,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_15,divide(identity,b3)) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_186]) ).

tcf(c_253,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_365,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(identity,divide(divide(X0,X1),X0)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_367,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(identity,divide(identity,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_365]) ).

tcf(c_372,plain,
    divide(identity,divide(iPr_def_21,identity)) = a4,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_365]) ).

tcf(c_377,plain,
    divide(identity,divide(iPr_def_16,a3)) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_365]) ).

tcf(c_500,plain,
    divide(identity,iPr_def_17) = a2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_503,plain,
    divide(identity,iPr_def_19) = b4,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_504,plain,
    divide(identity,iPr_def_21) = a4,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_505,plain,
    divide(identity,iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_508,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(X0,divide(divide(X0,X1),identity)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_367,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_510,plain,
    a2 = iPr_def_18,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_500,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_515,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_20 != iPr_def_22 )
    | ( iPr_def_18 != iPr_def_18 )
    | ( iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_16 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_510]) ).

tcf(c_516,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_20 != iPr_def_22 )
    | ( iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_16 ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_515]) ).

tcf(c_577,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(divide(identity,iPr_def_14),divide(divide(iPr_def_15,X0),identity)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_505,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_580,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(iPr_def_15,divide(divide(iPr_def_15,X0),identity)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_577,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_706,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(a4,divide(divide(identity,X0),iPr_def_21)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_372,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_787,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(iPr_def_15,divide(divide(a3,X0),iPr_def_16)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_377,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_950,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,divide(identity,identity)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_508]) ).

tcf(c_999,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(divide(X0,X1),identity) = divide(X0,divide(X1,identity)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_508,c_508]) ).

tcf(c_1002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : divide(divide(identity,divide(X0,X1)),divide(X2,X0)) = divide(divide(X1,X2),identity),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_508,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_1009,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(divide(X0,divide(X0,X1)),identity) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_1002]) ).

tcf(c_1097,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(X0,identity) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_950,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_1106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(a4,divide(divide(a4,X0),identity)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_504]) ).

tcf(c_1107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(a4,divide(a4,X0)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1106,c_999,c_1097]) ).

tcf(c_1109,plain,
    divide(a4,iPr_def_20) = iPr_def_19,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_1107]) ).

tcf(c_1111,plain,
    divide(a4,iPr_def_19) = iPr_def_20,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1109,c_1107]) ).

tcf(c_1161,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : divide(iPr_def_15,divide(iPr_def_15,X0)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_580,c_999,c_1097]) ).

tcf(c_1334,plain,
    divide(a4,divide(b4,iPr_def_21)) = iPr_def_19,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_503,c_706]) ).

tcf(c_1346,plain,
    divide(a4,iPr_def_22) = iPr_def_19,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1334,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_1409,plain,
    divide(a4,iPr_def_19) = iPr_def_22,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1346,c_1107]) ).

tcf(c_1410,plain,
    iPr_def_20 = iPr_def_22,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1409,c_1111]) ).

tcf(c_1411,plain,
    iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_16,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_516,c_1410]) ).

tcf(c_1502,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_15,divide(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_16)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_787]) ).

tcf(c_1511,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_16) = divide(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1502,c_1161]) ).

tcf(c_1512,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1511,c_253]) ).

tcf(c_1576,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : divide(X0,divide(X0,X1)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1009,c_999,c_1097]) ).

tcf(c_1652,plain,
    divide(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1512,c_1576]) ).

tcf(c_1654,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = iPr_def_16,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1652,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_1655,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1654,c_1411]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP094-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 13:36:35 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.03/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.03/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.03/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.03/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % 
% 2.03/1.29  % clauses                               16
% 2.03/1.29  % conjectures                           0
% 2.03/1.29  % EPR                                   1
% 2.03/1.29  % Horn                                  16
% 2.03/1.29  % unary                                 15
% 2.03/1.29  % binary                                0
% 2.03/1.29  % lits                                  18
% 2.03/1.29  % lits eq                               18
% 2.03/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.03/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.03/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.03/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.03/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ 
% 2.03/1.29  % Current options:
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.03/1.29  % 
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.03/1.29  
% 2.03/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------