↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : GRP098-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 10:09:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.51s
% Output   : Proof 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP098-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:18:21 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.51  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.52  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.52  Axiom 1 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = divide(X, inverse(Y)).
% 0.16/0.52  Axiom 2 (single_axiom): divide(divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), Z), divide(X, Z)) = Y.
% 0.16/0.52  
% 0.16/0.52  Lemma 3: divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), Z), inverse(W)), divide(X, Z)), Y) = W.
% 0.16/0.52  Proof:
% 0.16/0.52    divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), Z), inverse(W)), divide(X, Z)), Y)
% 0.16/0.52  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.16/0.52    divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), Z), inverse(W)), divide(X, Z)), divide(divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), Z), divide(X, Z)))
% 0.16/0.52  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) }
% 0.16/0.52    W
% 0.16/0.52  
% 0.16/0.52  Lemma 4: divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), X) = Y.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(X, inverse(Y)), X)
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(X, divide(divide(divide(Z, inverse(inverse(Y))), W), divide(Z, W))), X)
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 3 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(divide(Z, inverse(inverse(Y))), W), inverse(X)), divide(Z, W)), inverse(Y)), divide(divide(divide(Z, inverse(inverse(Y))), W), divide(Z, W))), X)
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.16/0.53    Y
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 5: divide(X, divide(Y, Y)) = X.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, divide(Y, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(divide(Y, inverse(X)), Y), divide(Y, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) }
% 0.16/0.53    X
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 6: divide(divide(X, X), inverse(Y)) = Y.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(X, X), inverse(Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(divide(X, X), inverse(Y)), divide(X, X))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.16/0.53    Y
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 7: divide(X, divide(divide(Y, inverse(X)), divide(Y, inverse(Z)))) = Z.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, divide(divide(Y, inverse(X)), divide(Y, inverse(Z))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(divide(divide(Y, inverse(X)), inverse(Z)), divide(Y, inverse(Z))), divide(divide(Y, inverse(X)), divide(Y, inverse(Z))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) }
% 0.16/0.53    Z
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 8: divide(X, divide(X, Y)) = Y.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, divide(X, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, divide(X, divide(divide(Z, Z), inverse(Y))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, divide(divide(divide(Z, Z), inverse(X)), divide(divide(Z, Z), inverse(Y))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.16/0.53    Y
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 9: inverse(inverse(X)) = X.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    inverse(inverse(X))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(inverse(inverse(X)), divide(Y, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(divide(Y, Y), divide(divide(Y, Y), inverse(inverse(X)))), divide(Y, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(divide(Y, Y), inverse(X)), divide(Y, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.16/0.53    X
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 10: divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)) = divide(Y, X).
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 7 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, divide(divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), divide(inverse(X), inverse(divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y))))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, divide(divide(divide(inverse(X), inverse(divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)))), inverse(X)), divide(inverse(X), inverse(divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y))))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, X)
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 11: divide(X, inverse(divide(Y, X))) = Y.
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, inverse(divide(Y, X)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(inverse(inverse(X)), inverse(divide(Y, X)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(Y, X), inverse(X))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(inverse(X), inverse(Y)), inverse(X))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.16/0.53    Y
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 12: inverse(divide(X, Y)) = divide(Y, X).
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    inverse(divide(X, Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, divide(Y, inverse(divide(X, Y))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, X)
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 13: divide(X, inverse(Y)) = divide(Y, inverse(X)).
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(X, inverse(Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(inverse(inverse(Y)), inverse(X))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, inverse(X))
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Lemma 14: divide(inverse(X), divide(inverse(Y), Z)) = divide(Y, divide(X, Z)).
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    divide(inverse(X), divide(inverse(Y), Z))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(inverse(X), inverse(divide(Z, inverse(Y))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(Z, inverse(Y)), X)
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(Z, X), inverse(divide(divide(divide(Z, inverse(Y)), X), divide(Z, X))))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(divide(Z, X), inverse(Y))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, inverse(divide(Z, X)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.16/0.53    divide(Y, divide(X, Z))
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms): tuple(multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(a4, b4)) = tuple(multiply(inverse(b1), b1), a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)), multiply(b4, a4)).
% 0.16/0.53  Proof:
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(multiply(inverse(a1), a1), multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), multiply(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), a2), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(a2)), multiply(multiply(a3, b3), c3), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(a2)), multiply(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), c3), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(a2)), divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), multiply(a4, b4))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), divide(divide(inverse(b2), inverse(b2)), inverse(a2)), divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(divide(a3, inverse(b3)), inverse(c3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(inverse(inverse(c3)), inverse(divide(a3, inverse(b3)))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(c3, inverse(divide(a3, inverse(b3)))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(c3, divide(inverse(b3), a3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(c3, divide(inverse(a3), inverse(inverse(b3)))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(c3, divide(inverse(a3), b3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(b3, divide(c3, divide(inverse(a3), b3)))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(inverse(c3), divide(inverse(b3), divide(inverse(a3), b3)))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(inverse(c3), divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(divide(inverse(a3), b3)))))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(inverse(c3), divide(inverse(divide(inverse(a3), b3)), b3))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 14 }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(divide(inverse(a3), b3), divide(c3, b3))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by lemma 11 R->L }
% 0.16/0.53    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(divide(divide(c3, inverse(divide(inverse(a3), c3))), b3), divide(c3, b3))), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.53  = { by axiom 2 (single_axiom) }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(b3, divide(inverse(a3), c3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 14 R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(inverse(inverse(a3)), divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(a4, inverse(b4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 13 R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), c3)), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(b3), inverse(inverse(c3)))), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(a3, divide(inverse(c3), b3)), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1)), a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(a1), divide(inverse(a1), divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)))), a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)), a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), divide(b4, inverse(a4)))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)), a2, divide(a3, inverse(divide(b3, inverse(c3)))), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)), a2, multiply(a3, divide(b3, inverse(c3))), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1)), a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.16/0.54  = { by axiom 1 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.16/0.54    tuple(multiply(inverse(b1), b1), a2, multiply(a3, multiply(b3, c3)), multiply(b4, a4))
% 0.16/0.54  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.54  
% 0.16/0.54  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------