↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP106-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:30:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.50s 6.21s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  41 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  73 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  36   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   97 (   0 sgn  97   !;   0   ?;  92   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)))))) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : multiply(X0,X1) = inverse(double_divide(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4)
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( multiply(a4,b4) != multiply(b4,a4)
    | multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))
    | a2 != multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)
    | multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) != inverse(double_divide(a4,b4))
    | inverse(double_divide(c3,inverse(double_divide(b3,a3)))) != inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(c3,b3)),a3))
    | a2 != inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2)))))
    | inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f4,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2,f2]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(c3,b3)),a3)) != inverse(double_divide(c3,inverse(double_divide(b3,a3)))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(b2))))) != a2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)))))) = X2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_113,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X2,X3))))),inverse(double_divide(X0,X2)))) = double_divide(X1,X3),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X2,X1))),X2)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_121,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X0,X2)))) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X3),inverse(double_divide(X1,X3))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_202,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,X1)),X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_221,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X0,X2)))),X1)) = X2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_338,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(double_divide(X0,X3)))),X1))) = double_divide(X2,X3),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_202]) ).

tcf(c_359,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,X1)),X2),X2),inverse(X0))) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_540,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),X2)),X1)))) = X2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_221]) ).

tcf(c_545,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),X2),X3)),X2)) = inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X3,X1)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_221]) ).

tcf(c_650,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))),X1)),X2) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_1686,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),X1),X2)) = inverse(double_divide(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_540]) ).

tcf(c_1725,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,X1)),inverse(X0))) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_359,c_1686]) ).

tcf(c_1805,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)))) = inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X0,X2)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_1725]) ).

tcf(c_1811,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),X2)),X1)) = inverse(double_divide(X2,inverse(X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_540,c_1725]) ).

tcf(c_1844,plain,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(c3,b3)),a3)) != inverse(double_divide(c3,inverse(double_divide(b3,a3)))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(b2,inverse(double_divide(a2,inverse(b2))))) != a2 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_1805]) ).

tcf(c_1850,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(X0))))) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_540,c_1811]) ).

tcf(c_1851,plain,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(c3,b3)),a3)) != inverse(double_divide(c3,inverse(double_divide(b3,a3)))) ) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1844,c_1850]) ).

tcf(c_2081,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X0,inverse(X1)),X0)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1850,c_1850]) ).

tcf(c_2213,plain,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(c3,b3)),a3)) != inverse(double_divide(b3,inverse(double_divide(c3,a3)))) ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1851,c_1805]) ).

tcf(c_2218,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_2081]) ).

tcf(c_2230,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),inverse(double_divide(X2,X1))) = double_divide(X2,inverse(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2081,c_202]) ).

tcf(c_2241,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(double_divide(X0,X1),X1) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2081,c_650]) ).

tcf(c_2242,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),inverse(X1)) = inverse(double_divide(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2081,c_1850]) ).

tcf(c_2247,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,inverse(inverse(double_divide(X1,X0)))) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_2230]) ).

tcf(c_2381,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(double_divide(X0,X1)),X2) = double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X1,X2))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2241,c_650]) ).

tcf(c_2383,plain,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(b3,inverse(double_divide(c3,a3)))) != inverse(double_divide(c3,inverse(double_divide(b3,a3)))) ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2213,c_2381]) ).

tcf(c_2384,plain,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(b4,a4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) ) ),
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_2383,c_1805]) ).

tcf(c_2392,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,double_divide(X1,X0)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2247,c_2218]) ).

tcf(c_2393,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,X1) = double_divide(X1,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2241,c_2392]) ).

tcf(c_2395,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,double_divide(X0,X1)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2392,c_2241]) ).

tcf(c_2398,plain,
    ( ( inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) != inverse(double_divide(a4,b4)) )
    | ( inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2384,c_2393]) ).

tcf(c_2399,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(a1,inverse(a1))) != inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))),
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_2398]) ).

tcf(c_2638,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(inverse(X0),X1)) = double_divide(X0,inverse(X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2218,c_2242]) ).

tcf(c_2641,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(X1))) = double_divide(inverse(X0),X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2218,c_2242]) ).

tcf(c_2651,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : inverse(double_divide(X0,inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)))) = double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(X0,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1805,c_2641]) ).

tcf(c_2652,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(b1,inverse(b1))) != double_divide(inverse(a1),a1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2399,c_2641]) ).

tcf(c_2661,plain,
    double_divide(a1,inverse(a1)) != double_divide(b1,inverse(b1)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2652,c_2393,c_2641]) ).

tcf(c_2673,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))) = inverse(double_divide(X0,double_divide(inverse(X1),X2))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2638,c_2242]) ).

tcf(c_2918,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(X1,X2)) = double_divide(inverse(X1),double_divide(X0,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_545,c_1811,c_2651]) ).

tcf(c_2960,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(inverse(X0),double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2918,c_2392]) ).

tcf(c_3014,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : inverse(double_divide(X0,double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)))) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2960,c_2393,c_2673]) ).

tcf(c_3029,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,double_divide(X1,inverse(X1))) = inverse(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3014,c_2218]) ).

tcf(c_3167,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : double_divide(X0,inverse(X0)) = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3029,c_2395]) ).

tcf(c_3179,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2661,c_3167]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP106-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 13:33:34 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.44  % Proving...
% 2.50/6.21  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/6.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.50/6.21  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.50/6.21  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Proving...
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % 
% 2.50/6.21  % clauses                               2
% 2.50/6.21  % conjectures                           1
% 2.50/6.21  % EPR                                   0
% 2.50/6.21  % Horn                                  2
% 2.50/6.21  % unary                                 1
% 2.50/6.21  % binary                                0
% 2.50/6.21  % lits                                  5
% 2.50/6.21  % lits eq                               5
% 2.50/6.21  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.50/6.21  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.50/6.21  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.50/6.21  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.50/6.21  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ 
% 2.50/6.21  % Current options:
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % ------ Proving...
% 2.50/6.21  % 
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.50/6.21  
% 2.50/6.21  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------