↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP123-3.003 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.coWtT9M3np true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:35:40 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : GRP123-3.003 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.coWtT9M3np true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:10:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.82  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.60/0.82  % BCE start: 32
% 0.60/0.82  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.82  % PE start: 32
% 0.60/0.82  logic: neq
% 0.60/0.82  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.82  % done 96 iterations in 0.054s
% 0.60/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.82  thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(group_element_type, type, group_element: $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(product_type, type, product: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_3_type, type, e_3: $i).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_2_type, type, e_2: $i).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_1_type, type, e_1: $i).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_1_is_not_e_2, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_1 @ e_2 ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_1 @ e_2)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_1_is_not_e_2])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(product_idempotence, axiom, (product @ X @ X @ X)).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(product_left_cancellation, axiom,
% 0.60/0.82    (( ~( product @ W @ Y @ X ) ) | ( ~( product @ Z @ Y @ X ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( equalish @ W @ Z ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (equalish @ X0 @ X3))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_left_cancellation])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (product @ X1 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(product_total_function1, axiom,
% 0.60/0.82    (( ~( group_element @ X ) ) | ( ~( group_element @ Y ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( product @ X @ Y @ e_1 ) | ( product @ X @ Y @ e_2 ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( product @ X @ Y @ e_3 ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ X0 @ X1 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ X0 @ X1 @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ X0 @ X1 @ e_3))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_total_function1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (product @ X1 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ X0 @ X1 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ X0 @ X1 @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ X0 @ X1 @ e_3))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_total_function1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(qg1_2, conjecture,
% 0.60/0.82    (~( ( equalish @ Y1 @ Y2 ) | ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y2 @ X2 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82        ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y1 @ X1 ) ) | ( ~( product @ X2 @ Y2 @ Z1 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82        ( ~( product @ X1 @ Y1 @ Z1 ) ) ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.82    (( equalish @ Y1 @ Y2 ) | ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y2 @ X2 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y1 @ X1 ) ) | ( ~( product @ X2 @ Y2 @ Z1 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( ~( product @ X1 @ Y1 @ Z1 ) )),
% 0.60/0.82    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [qg1_2])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X2 @ X1 @ X3)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X2 @ X0 @ X4)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X3 @ X1 @ X5)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X4 @ X0 @ X5))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl153, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (product @ X3 @ X2 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X2 @ X3)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (equalish @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl31])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl153])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl165, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl164, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl170, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (product @ e_3 @ X0 @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ e_3 @ X0 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ e_3)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (equalish @ X0 @ e_3))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl165])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(element_3, axiom, (group_element @ e_3)).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, ( (group_element @ e_3)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_3])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl171, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (product @ e_3 @ X0 @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ e_3 @ X0 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (equalish @ X0 @ e_3))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl170, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl203, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (( (equalish @ e_2 @ e_3)
% 0.60/0.82        |  (equalish @ e_2 @ e_3)
% 0.60/0.82        | ~ (group_element @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82        |  (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_1))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl91, zip_derived_cl171])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_2_is_not_e_3, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_2 @ e_3 ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_2 @ e_3)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_2_is_not_e_3])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_2 @ e_3)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_2_is_not_e_3])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(element_2, axiom, (group_element @ e_2)).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (group_element @ e_2)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_2])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl206, plain, ( (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_1)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.60/0.82                [zip_derived_cl203, zip_derived_cl22, zip_derived_cl22, 
% 0.60/0.82                 zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(qg1_1, conjecture,
% 0.60/0.82    (~( ( equalish @ X1 @ X2 ) | ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y2 @ X2 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82        ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y1 @ X1 ) ) | ( ~( product @ X2 @ Y2 @ Z1 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82        ( ~( product @ X1 @ Y1 @ Z1 ) ) ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.82    (( equalish @ X1 @ X2 ) | ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y2 @ X2 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( ~( product @ Z2 @ Y1 @ X1 ) ) | ( ~( product @ X2 @ Y2 @ Z1 ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( ~( product @ X1 @ Y1 @ Z1 ) )),
% 0.60/0.82    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [qg1_1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X2 @ X3 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X2 @ X4 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X1 @ X3 @ X5)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X4 @ X5))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl127, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (product @ X3 @ X2 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X2 @ X3)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (equalish @ X3 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl30])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl220, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ e_3 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_3)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ e_1 @ X0 @ e_1))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl206, zip_derived_cl127])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_3_is_not_e_1, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_3 @ e_1 ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_3 @ e_1)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_3_is_not_e_1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl222, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_3) | ~ (product @ e_1 @ X0 @ e_1))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl220, zip_derived_cl23])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl223, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (group_element @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ e_1 @ X0 @ e_1))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl222])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (group_element @ e_2)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_2])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(element_1, axiom, (group_element @ e_1)).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, ( (group_element @ e_1)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl224, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_1)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ e_1 @ X0 @ e_1))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.60/0.82                [zip_derived_cl223, zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl288, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (( (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_1) |  (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_2))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl224])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl302, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (( (equalish @ e_2 @ e_1) |  (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_1))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl91, zip_derived_cl288])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(e_2_is_not_e_1, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_2 @ e_1 ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_2 @ e_1)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_2_is_not_e_1])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl303, plain, ( (product @ e_1 @ e_2 @ e_1)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl302, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(product_right_cancellation, axiom,
% 0.60/0.82    (( ~( product @ X @ W @ Y ) ) | ( ~( product @ X @ Z @ Y ) ) | 
% 0.60/0.82     ( equalish @ W @ Z ))).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82          | ~ (product @ X0 @ X3 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82          |  (equalish @ X1 @ X3))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_right_cancellation])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain,
% 0.60/0.82      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82         ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl311, plain, ( (equalish @ e_1 @ e_2)),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl303, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 0.60/0.82  thf(zip_derived_cl323, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.82      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl311])).
% 0.60/0.82  
% 0.60/0.82  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.82  
% 0.60/0.82  
% 0.60/0.82  % Terminating...
% 1.60/0.87  % Runner terminated.
% 1.60/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------