↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GRP124-2.004 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:38:48 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.68s 58.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : GRP124-2.004 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 11:52:09 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.57/0.62  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.68/58.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.68/58.83  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.68/58.83  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.68/58.83  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.68/58.83  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.68/58.83  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.68/58.83  
% 58.68/58.83  % Result      :Theorem 58.020000s
% 58.68/58.83  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.020000s
% 58.68/58.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.68/58.85  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.68/58.85  % File     : GRP124-2.004 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 58.68/58.85  % Domain   : Group Theory (Quasigroups)
% 58.68/58.85  % Problem  : (3,1,2) conjugate orthogonality
% 58.68/58.85  % Version  : [Sla93] axioms : Augmented.
% 58.68/58.85  % English  : If ab=xy and a*b = x*y then a=x and b=y, where c*a=b iff ab=c.
% 58.68/58.85  %            Generate the multiplication table for the specified quasi-
% 58.68/58.85  %            group with 4 elements.
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  % Refs     : [FSB93] Fujita et al. (1993), Automatic Generation of Some Res
% 58.68/58.85  %          : [Sla93] Slaney (1993), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 58.68/58.85  %          : [SFS95] Slaney et al. (1995), Automated Reasoning and Exhausti
% 58.68/58.85  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 58.68/58.85  % Names    :
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.68/58.85  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 58.68/58.85  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  26 unt;   1 nHn;  32 RR)
% 58.68/58.85  %            Number of literals    :   54 (   0 equ;  31 neg)
% 58.68/58.85  %            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
% 58.68/58.85  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 58.68/58.85  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 58.68/58.85  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
% 58.68/58.85  %            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn)
% 58.68/58.85  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  % Comments : [SFS93]'s axiomatization has been modified for this.
% 58.68/58.85  %          : Substitution axioms are not needed, as any positive equality
% 58.68/58.85  %            literals should resolve on negative ones directly.
% 58.68/58.85  %          : As in GRP123-1, either one of qg2_1 or qg2_2 may be used, as
% 58.68/58.85  %            each implies the other in this scenario, with the help of
% 58.68/58.85  %            cancellation. The dependence cannot be proved, so both have
% 58.68/58.85  %            been left in here.
% 58.68/58.85  %          : Version 2 has simple isomorphism avoidance (as mentioned in
% 58.68/58.85  %            [FSB93])
% 58.68/58.85  %          : tptp2X: -f tptp -s4 GRP124-2.g
% 58.68/58.85  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_1_then_e_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      next(e_1,e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_2_then_e_3,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      next(e_2,e_3) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_3_then_e_4,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      next(e_3,e_4) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_2_greater_e_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      greater(e_2,e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_3_greater_e_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      greater(e_3,e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_4_greater_e_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      greater(e_4,e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_3_greater_e_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      greater(e_3,e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_4_greater_e_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      greater(e_4,e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_4_greater_e_3,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      greater(e_4,e_3) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(no_redundancy,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ product(X,e_1,Y)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ next(X,X1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ greater(Y,X1) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(element_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      group_element(e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(element_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      group_element(e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(element_3,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      group_element(e_3) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(element_4,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      group_element(e_4) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_1_is_not_e_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_1,e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_1_is_not_e_3,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_1,e_3) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_1_is_not_e_4,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_1,e_4) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_2_is_not_e_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_2,e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_2_is_not_e_3,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_2,e_3) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_2_is_not_e_4,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_2,e_4) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_3_is_not_e_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_3,e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_3_is_not_e_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_3,e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_3_is_not_e_4,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_3,e_4) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_4_is_not_e_1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_4,e_1) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_4_is_not_e_2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_4,e_2) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(e_4_is_not_e_3,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ~ equalish(e_4,e_3) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(product_total_function1,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ group_element(X)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ group_element(Y)
% 58.68/58.85      | product(X,Y,e_1)
% 58.68/58.85      | product(X,Y,e_2)
% 58.68/58.85      | product(X,Y,e_3)
% 58.68/58.85      | product(X,Y,e_4) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(product_total_function2,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ product(X,Y,W)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(X,Y,Z)
% 58.68/58.85      | equalish(W,Z) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(product_right_cancellation,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ product(X,W,Y)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(X,Z,Y)
% 58.68/58.85      | equalish(W,Z) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(product_left_cancellation,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ product(W,Y,X)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(Z,Y,X)
% 58.68/58.85      | equalish(W,Z) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(product_idempotence,axiom,
% 58.68/58.85      product(X,X,X) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(qg2_1,negated_conjecture,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ product(X1,Y1,Z1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(X2,Y2,Z1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(Z2,X1,Y1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(Z2,X2,Y2)
% 58.68/58.85      | equalish(X1,X2) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  cnf(qg2_2,negated_conjecture,
% 58.68/58.85      ( ~ product(X1,Y1,Z1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(X2,Y2,Z1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(Z2,X1,Y1)
% 58.68/58.85      | ~ product(Z2,X2,Y2)
% 58.68/58.85      | equalish(Y1,Y2) ) ).
% 58.68/58.85  
% 58.68/58.85  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.68/58.85  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.68/58.85  % Proof found
% 58.68/58.85  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.68/58.85  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.68/58.86  %ClaNum:33(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.68/58.86  %VarNum:71(SingletonVarNum:30)
% 58.68/58.86  %MaxLitNum:6
% 58.68/58.86  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 58.68/58.86  %SharedTerms:29
% 58.68/58.86  %goalClause: 32 33
% 58.68/58.86  [1]P1(a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [2]P1(a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [3]P1(a3)
% 58.68/58.86  [4]P1(a4)
% 58.68/58.86  [5]P4(a1,a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [6]P4(a2,a3)
% 58.68/58.86  [7]P4(a3,a4)
% 58.68/58.86  [8]P2(a2,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [9]P2(a3,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [10]P2(a3,a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [11]P2(a4,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [12]P2(a4,a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [13]P2(a4,a3)
% 58.68/58.86  [15]~P3(a1,a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [16]~P3(a1,a3)
% 58.68/58.86  [17]~P3(a1,a4)
% 58.68/58.86  [18]~P3(a2,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [19]~P3(a2,a3)
% 58.68/58.86  [20]~P3(a2,a4)
% 58.68/58.86  [21]~P3(a3,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [22]~P3(a3,a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [23]~P3(a3,a4)
% 58.68/58.86  [24]~P3(a4,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  [25]~P3(a4,a2)
% 58.68/58.86  [26]~P3(a4,a3)
% 58.68/58.86  [14]P5(x141,x141,x141)
% 58.68/58.86  [27]~P4(x271,x272)+~P2(x273,x272)+~P5(x271,a1,x273)
% 58.68/58.86  [28]~P5(x283,x284,x281)+P3(x281,x282)+~P5(x283,x284,x282)
% 58.68/58.86  [29]~P5(x293,x291,x294)+P3(x291,x292)+~P5(x293,x292,x294)
% 58.68/58.86  [30]~P5(x301,x303,x304)+P3(x301,x302)+~P5(x302,x303,x304)
% 58.68/58.86  [32]~P5(x325,x321,x326)+P3(x321,x322)+~P5(x323,x324,x322)+~P5(x323,x325,x321)+~P5(x324,x322,x326)
% 58.68/58.86  [33]~P5(x331,x335,x336)+P3(x331,x332)+~P5(x333,x332,x334)+~P5(x333,x331,x335)+~P5(x332,x334,x336)
% 58.68/58.86  [31]~P1(x312)+~P1(x311)+P5(x311,x312,a2)+P5(x311,x312,a3)+P5(x311,x312,a4)+P5(x311,x312,a1)
% 58.68/58.86  %EqnAxiom
% 58.68/58.86  
% 58.68/58.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323725,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237251,x3237251,x3237251)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323727,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a1,a1)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,14,323725,29,30])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323728,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237281,x3237281,x3237281)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323731,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237311,x3237311,x3237311)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323733,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a1,a4)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,13,15,14,323725,323728,29,30,28,27])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323737,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,x3237371,a1)+~P5(a1,a2,x3237371)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,13,15,14,323725,323728,323731,29,30,28,27,32,33])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323740,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a4,a1)+P5(a1,a2,a2)+P5(a1,a2,a3)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,13,15,14,323725,323728,323731,29,30,28,27,32,33,31])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323742,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237421,x3237421,x3237421)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323744,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a1,a3,a1)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,14,323742,30,29])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323780,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237801,x3237801,x3237801)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323782,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a3,a2)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,14,323780,30,29])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323783,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237831,x3237831,x3237831)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323786,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3237861,x3237861,x3237861)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323792,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(a2,a1,a3)+P5(a2,a1,a2)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,19,323733,323727,2,14,323780,323783,323786,30,29,28,33,27,31])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323794,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a4,a2)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,14,29])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323808,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a1,a3,a3)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,14,30])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323809,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3238091,x3238091,x3238091)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323812,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3238121,x3238121,x3238121)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323815,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3238151,x3238151,x3238151)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323821,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a1,x3238211,a3)+~P5(x3238211,a3,a1)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,7,14,323809,323812,323815,30,29,28,33,27,32])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323826,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3238261,x3238261,x3238261)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323828,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a3,a3)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,14,323826,29,30])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323876,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a4,a4)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,14,30])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323910,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3239101,x3239101,x3239101)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323913,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(x3239131,x3239131,x3239131)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323917,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(a2,a1,a3)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,14,323910,323913,30,29,32,323792])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323918,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(a1,a2,a3)+~P5(a2,a4,a1)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,14,323910,323913,30,29,32,323792,323740])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323922,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(a1,a3,a4)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,323808,323744,18,3,14,323910,323913,30,29,32,323792,323740,33,31])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323940,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (P5(a1,a2,a3)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[323917,323794,323876,323922,4,9,17,2,14,27,29,33,32,31,323918])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323943,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     (~P5(a2,a3,a4)),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[323917,323794,323876,323922,4,9,17,2,15,14,27,29,33,32,31,323918,323737,30])).
% 58.88/59.06  cnf(323946,plain,
% 58.88/59.06     ($false),
% 58.88/59.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[323940,2,323943,3,323828,323782,323821,31]),
% 58.88/59.06     ['proof']).
% 58.99/59.20  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.99/59.20  % Total time :58.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------