↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP127-3.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 14.92s 15.13s
% Output   : Refutation 14.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem  : GRP127-3.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 14:41:18 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.39  Mon Jun 13 14:41:18 2022
% 0.21/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 10219.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  list(usable).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_2,e_1).
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_1).
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_2).
% 0.21/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -equalish(e_4,e_3).
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.39  
% 0.21/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.21/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 53
% 0.21/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.21/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.21/0.41     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.21/0.41     distinct function count: 0
% 0.21/0.41     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Changing weight limit from 60 to 24.
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 3 [ 2 1 390 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 4 [ 4 0 192 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 5 [ 4 1 255 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 6 [ 6 1 293 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 7 [ 3 0 7115 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 8 [ 4 0 224 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 9 [ 8 1 2409 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 10 [ 6 1 3963 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 11 [ 6 1 9547 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 12 [ 6 0 592 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Model 13 [ 5 2 84634 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.57/8.77  
% 8.57/8.77  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 110 givens.
% 8.57/8.77  
% 12.66/12.87  
% 12.66/12.87  
% 12.66/12.87  Changing weight limit from 24 to 21.
% 12.66/12.87  
% 12.66/12.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 12.66/12.87  
% 12.66/12.87  Model 14 [ 7 0 354 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.66/12.87  
% 12.66/12.87  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 140 givens.
% 12.66/12.87  
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  Model 15 [ 8 1 14219 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  Model 16 [ 10 1 3394 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.48/13.67  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 150 givens.
% 13.48/13.67  
% 13.69/13.90  
% 13.69/13.90  
% 13.69/13.90  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 13.69/13.90  
% 13.69/13.90  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 160 givens.
% 13.69/13.90  
% 14.92/15.12  
% 14.92/15.12  
% 14.92/15.12  Changing weight limit from 19 to 20.
% 14.92/15.12  
% 14.92/15.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.92/15.12  
% 14.92/15.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.92/15.12  
% 14.92/15.12  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 185 givens.
% 14.92/15.12  
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  14.70 sec ----> 5772 [binary,5770.1,14.1] {-} $F.
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  Length of proof is 32.  Level of proof is 12.
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 14.92/15.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 14.92/15.13  % SZS output start Refutation
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  2 [] {+} -group_element(A)|cycle(A,e_0)|cycle(A,e_1)|cycle(A,e_2)|cycle(A,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  3 [] {+} -cycle(A,B)| -cycle(C,D)| -next(A,C)| -greater(B,e_0)| -next(D,E)|equalish(B,E).
% 14.92/15.13  4 [] {+} -cycle(A,B)| -cycle(C,e_0)| -cycle(D,E)| -next(C,D)| -greater(C,A)| -greater(B,E).
% 14.92/15.13  5 [] {+} -cycle(A,e_0)| -product(A,e_1,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 14.92/15.13  6 [] {+} -cycle(A,B)| -product(A,e_1,C)| -greater(B,e_0)| -next(A,D)|equalish(C,D).
% 14.92/15.13  7 [] {-} -equalish(e_1,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  8 [copy,7,flip.1] {+} -equalish(e_2,e_1).
% 14.92/15.13  9 [] {-} -equalish(e_1,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  10 [copy,9,flip.1] {+} -equalish(e_3,e_1).
% 14.92/15.13  13 [] {-} -equalish(e_2,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  14 [copy,13,flip.1] {+} -equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  17 [] {-} -equalish(e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  18 [copy,17,flip.1] {+} -equalish(e_4,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  19 [] {+} -group_element(A)| -group_element(B)|product(A,B,e_1)|product(A,B,e_2)|product(A,B,e_3)|product(A,B,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  21 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,C)|equalish(B,D).
% 14.92/15.13  22 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(D,B,C)|equalish(A,D).
% 14.92/15.13  23 [] {+} -product(A,B,C)| -product(C,A,D)|product(D,A,B).
% 14.92/15.13  40 [] {+} next(e_0,e_1).
% 14.92/15.13  41 [] {+} next(e_1,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  42 [] {+} next(e_2,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  43 [] {+} next(e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  44 [] {-} greater(e_1,e_0).
% 14.92/15.13  45 [] {-} greater(e_2,e_0).
% 14.92/15.13  46 [] {+} greater(e_3,e_0).
% 14.92/15.13  51 [] {+} greater(e_3,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  52 [] {+} greater(e_4,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  54 [] {-} cycle(e_4,e_0).
% 14.92/15.13  55 [] {+} group_element(e_1).
% 14.92/15.13  56 [] {-} group_element(e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  57 [] {+} group_element(e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  59 [] {-} product(A,A,A).
% 14.92/15.13  85 [hyper,56,19,55] {-} product(e_1,e_2,e_1)|product(e_1,e_2,e_2)|product(e_1,e_2,e_3)|product(e_1,e_2,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  86 [hyper,56,19,55] {-} product(e_2,e_1,e_1)|product(e_2,e_1,e_2)|product(e_2,e_1,e_3)|product(e_2,e_1,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  87 [hyper,56,2] {-} cycle(e_2,e_0)|cycle(e_2,e_1)|cycle(e_2,e_2)|cycle(e_2,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  96 [hyper,57,19,56] {-} product(e_2,e_3,e_1)|product(e_2,e_3,e_2)|product(e_2,e_3,e_3)|product(e_2,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  97 [hyper,57,19,55] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_1)|product(e_1,e_3,e_2)|product(e_1,e_3,e_3)|product(e_1,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  100 [hyper,57,2] {-} cycle(e_3,e_0)|cycle(e_3,e_1)|cycle(e_3,e_2)|cycle(e_3,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  1309 [hyper,100,3,54,43,45,40,unit_del,8] {-} cycle(e_3,e_0)|cycle(e_3,e_1)|cycle(e_3,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  1433 [hyper,1309,3,54,43,46,40,unit_del,10] {-} cycle(e_3,e_0)|cycle(e_3,e_1).
% 14.92/15.13  1434 [hyper,1433,4,87,54,43,51,46] {-} cycle(e_3,e_1)|cycle(e_2,e_0)|cycle(e_2,e_1)|cycle(e_2,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  1672 [hyper,1434,3,87,42,46,41,unit_del,14,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} cycle(e_2,e_0)|cycle(e_2,e_1)|cycle(e_2,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  1673 [hyper,1434,4,1433,54,43,51,44,factor_simp] {-} cycle(e_3,e_1)|cycle(e_2,e_0)|cycle(e_2,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  1771 [hyper,1673,3,1672,42,44,41,unit_del,8,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} cycle(e_2,e_0)|cycle(e_2,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  4611 [hyper,85,21,59,unit_del,8] {-} product(e_1,e_2,e_2)|product(e_1,e_2,e_3)|product(e_1,e_2,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  4617 [hyper,4611,22,59,unit_del,8] {-} product(e_1,e_2,e_3)|product(e_1,e_2,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  4786 [hyper,86,22,59,unit_del,8] {-} product(e_2,e_1,e_2)|product(e_2,e_1,e_3)|product(e_2,e_1,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  4799 [hyper,4786,21,59,unit_del,8] {-} product(e_2,e_1,e_3)|product(e_2,e_1,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  4809 [hyper,4799,5,1771,52] {-} product(e_2,e_1,e_3)|cycle(e_2,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  5008 [hyper,4809,6,4799,45,42,unit_del,18,factor_simp] {-} product(e_2,e_1,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  5441 [hyper,96,21,59,unit_del,14] {-} product(e_2,e_3,e_1)|product(e_2,e_3,e_3)|product(e_2,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5449 [hyper,5441,22,59,unit_del,14] {-} product(e_2,e_3,e_1)|product(e_2,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5451 [hyper,5449,23,4617] {-} product(e_2,e_3,e_4)|product(e_3,e_2,e_3)|product(e_1,e_2,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5517 [hyper,5451,22,4617,unit_del,10,factor_simp] {-} product(e_2,e_3,e_4)|product(e_1,e_2,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5524 [hyper,97,21,59,unit_del,10] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_2)|product(e_1,e_3,e_3)|product(e_1,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5609 [hyper,5524,22,59,unit_del,10] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_2)|product(e_1,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5621 [hyper,5609,23,5008] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_4)|product(e_3,e_1,e_3).
% 14.92/15.13  5710 [hyper,5621,22,5008,unit_del,14] {-} product(e_1,e_3,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5718 [hyper,5710,22,5517,unit_del,8] {-} product(e_1,e_2,e_4).
% 14.92/15.13  5770 [hyper,5718,21,5710] {-} equalish(e_3,e_2).
% 14.92/15.13  5772 [binary,5770.1,14.1] {-} $F.
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  % SZS output end Refutation
% 14.92/15.13  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  ============ end of search ============
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  true clauses given          55      (29.7%)
% 14.92/15.13  false clauses given        130
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13        FALSE     TRUE
% 14.92/15.13     4  3         0
% 14.92/15.13     9  0         29
% 14.92/15.13    10  0         16
% 14.92/15.13    11  0         126
% 14.92/15.13    12  2         128
% 14.92/15.13    13  0         52
% 14.92/15.13    14  0         88
% 14.92/15.13    15  23        817
% 14.92/15.13    16  9         162
% 14.92/15.13    17  10        346
% 14.92/15.13    18  0         403
% 14.92/15.13    19  16        202
% 14.92/15.13  tot:  63        2369      (97.4% true)
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  Model 16 [ 10 -183 3394 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 14.92/15.13  
% 14.92/15.13  Process 10219 finished Mon Jun 13 14:41:33 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------