↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GRP132-1.002 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:38:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 76.13s 76.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 76.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem    : GRP132-1.002 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 08:22:23 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.54  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 76.13/76.70  %-------------------------------------------
% 76.13/76.70  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 76.13/76.70  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 76.13/76.70  % Transform   :cnf
% 76.13/76.70  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 76.13/76.70  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 76.13/76.70  
% 76.13/76.70  % Result      :Theorem 75.650000s
% 76.13/76.70  % Output      :CNFRefutation 75.650000s
% 76.13/76.70  %-------------------------------------------
% 76.13/76.71  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 76.13/76.71  % File     : GRP132-1.002 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 76.13/76.71  % Domain   : Group Theory (Quasigroups)
% 76.13/76.71  % Problem  : (3,1,2) conjugate orthogonality, no idempotence
% 76.13/76.71  % Version  : [Sla93] axioms.
% 76.13/76.71  % English  : Generate the multiplication table for the specified quasi-
% 76.13/76.71  %            group with 2 elements.
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  % Refs     : [FSB93] Fujita et al. (1993), Automatic Generation of Some Res
% 76.13/76.71  %          : [Sla93] Slaney (1993), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 76.13/76.71  %          : [SFS95] Slaney et al. (1995), Automated Reasoning and Exhausti
% 76.13/76.71  % Source   : [Sla93]
% 76.13/76.71  % Names    : QG2-ni [Sla93]
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 76.13/76.71  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 76.13/76.71  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   4 unt;   1 nHn;  10 RR)
% 76.13/76.71  %            Number of literals    :   27 (   0 equ;  18 neg)
% 76.13/76.71  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 76.13/76.71  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 76.13/76.71  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 76.13/76.71  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 76.13/76.71  %            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn)
% 76.13/76.71  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  % Comments : Slaney's [1993] axiomatization has been modified for this.
% 76.13/76.71  %          : Substitution axioms are not needed, as any positive equality
% 76.13/76.71  %            literals should resolve on negative ones directly.
% 76.13/76.71  %          : As in GRP130-1, either one of qg2_1 or qg2_2 may be used, as
% 76.13/76.71  %            each implies the other in this scenario, with the help of
% 76.13/76.71  %            cancellation. The dependence cannot be proved, so both have
% 76.13/76.71  %            been left in here.
% 76.13/76.71  %          : tptp2X: -f tptp -s2 GRP132-1.g
% 76.13/76.71  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(element_1,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      group_element(e_1) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(element_2,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      group_element(e_2) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(e_1_is_not_e_2,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      ~ equalish(e_1,e_2) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(e_2_is_not_e_1,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      ~ equalish(e_2,e_1) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(product_total_function1,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      ( ~ group_element(X)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ group_element(Y)
% 76.13/76.71      | product(X,Y,e_1)
% 76.13/76.71      | product(X,Y,e_2) ) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(product_total_function2,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      ( ~ product(X,Y,W)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(X,Y,Z)
% 76.13/76.71      | equalish(W,Z) ) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(product_right_cancellation,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      ( ~ product(X,W,Y)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(X,Z,Y)
% 76.13/76.71      | equalish(W,Z) ) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(product_left_cancellation,axiom,
% 76.13/76.71      ( ~ product(W,Y,X)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(Z,Y,X)
% 76.13/76.71      | equalish(W,Z) ) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(qg2_1,negated_conjecture,
% 76.13/76.71      ( ~ product(X1,Y1,Z1)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(X2,Y2,Z1)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(Z2,X1,Y1)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(Z2,X2,Y2)
% 76.13/76.71      | equalish(X1,X2) ) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  cnf(qg2_2,negated_conjecture,
% 76.13/76.71      ( ~ product(X1,Y1,Z1)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(X2,Y2,Z1)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(Z2,X1,Y1)
% 76.13/76.71      | ~ product(Z2,X2,Y2)
% 76.13/76.71      | equalish(Y1,Y2) ) ).
% 76.13/76.71  
% 76.13/76.71  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 76.13/76.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 76.13/76.71  % Proof found
% 76.13/76.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 76.13/76.71  % SZS output start Proof
% 76.13/76.72  %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:0)
% 76.13/76.72  %VarNum:58(SingletonVarNum:26)
% 76.13/76.72  %MaxLitNum:5
% 76.13/76.72  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 76.13/76.72  %SharedTerms:6
% 76.13/76.72  %goalClause: 9 10
% 76.13/76.72  [1]P1(a1)
% 76.13/76.72  [2]P1(a2)
% 76.13/76.72  [3]~P2(a1,a2)
% 76.13/76.72  [4]~P2(a2,a1)
% 76.13/76.72  [6]~P3(x63,x64,x61)+P2(x61,x62)+~P3(x63,x64,x62)
% 76.13/76.72  [7]~P3(x73,x71,x74)+P2(x71,x72)+~P3(x73,x72,x74)
% 76.13/76.72  [8]~P3(x81,x83,x84)+P2(x81,x82)+~P3(x82,x83,x84)
% 76.13/76.72  [5]~P1(x52)+~P1(x51)+P3(x51,x52,a2)+P3(x51,x52,a1)
% 76.13/76.72  [9]~P3(x95,x91,x96)+P2(x91,x92)+~P3(x93,x94,x92)+~P3(x93,x95,x91)+~P3(x94,x92,x96)
% 76.13/76.72  [10]~P3(x101,x105,x106)+P2(x101,x102)+~P3(x103,x102,x104)+~P3(x103,x101,x105)+~P3(x102,x104,x106)
% 76.13/76.72  %EqnAxiom
% 76.13/76.72  
% 76.13/76.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64926,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(x649261,x649262,a2)+~P3(x649261,x649262,a1)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,6])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64935,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(a1,x649351,x649352)+~P3(a2,x649351,x649352)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,8])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64946,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(a1,a2,a1)+P3(a1,a1,a2)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,5,9,7])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64950,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(a1,a2,x649501)+~P3(a2,x649501,a1)+P3(a1,a1,a2)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,3,5,9,7,8,10])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64953,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(a1,a2,a2)+~P3(a2,x649531,a1)+~P3(a1,a2,x649531)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,7,64950])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64954,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (P3(a2,a2,a1)+P3(a2,a2,a2)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64961,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(x649611,a2,x649612)+~P3(a1,x649613,x649614)+~P3(a2,x649612,x649614)+~P3(x649611,a1,x649613)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,10])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64979,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (P3(a1,a2,a1)+~P3(a2,a2,a1)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,64953,5])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64980,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (~P3(a2,a2,a1)+~P3(a1,a2,a2)),
% 76.24/76.76     inference(scs_inference,[],[64979,64926])).
% 76.24/76.76  cnf(64981,plain,
% 76.24/76.76     (P3(a2,a2,a2)+~P3(a1,a2,a2)),
% 76.24/76.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[64980,64954])).
% 76.24/76.77  cnf(64982,plain,
% 76.24/76.77     (~P3(a1,a2,a2)),
% 76.24/76.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[64981,64935])).
% 76.24/76.77  cnf(69753,plain,
% 76.24/76.77     (~P1(x697531)+P3(x697531,x697532,a1)+P3(x697531,x697532,a2)+~P1(x697532)),
% 76.24/76.77     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 76.24/76.77  cnf(69761,plain,
% 76.24/76.77     (~P3(a2,a1,a1)),
% 76.24/76.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,64982,1,3,4,5,64946,6,7,8,64961])).
% 76.24/76.77  cnf(69767,plain,
% 76.24/76.77     (~P3(a2,a1,a2)),
% 76.24/76.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,64982,1,3,4,5,64946,6,7,8,64961,69753,9,64935])).
% 76.24/76.77  cnf(69770,plain,
% 76.24/76.77     ($false),
% 76.24/76.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,69761,69767,1,5]),
% 76.24/76.77     ['proof']).
% 76.31/76.82  % SZS output end Proof
% 76.31/76.82  % Total time :75.650000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------