↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP135-1.002 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:42:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  13 unt;  12 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   85 (   0 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(product_total_function1,axiom,
    ( ~ group_element(X2)
    | ~ group_element(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,e_2)
    | product(X1,X2,e_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_total_function1) ).

cnf(element_2,axiom,
    group_element(e_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',element_2) ).

cnf(product_right_cancellation,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | equalish(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_right_cancellation) ).

cnf(product_left_cancellation,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_left_cancellation) ).

cnf(e_1_is_not_e_2,axiom,
    ~ equalish(e_1,e_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e_1_is_not_e_2) ).

cnf(element_1,axiom,
    group_element(e_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',element_1) ).

cnf(qg3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X4,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qg3) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ group_element(X2)
    | ~ group_element(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,e_2)
    | product(X1,X2,e_1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[product_total_function1]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ group_element(X2)
    | ~ group_element(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,e_2)
    | product(X1,X2,e_1) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    group_element(e_2),
    element_2 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | equalish(X2,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[product_right_cancellation]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ group_element(X1)
    | product(X1,e_2,e_2)
    | product(X1,e_2,e_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ product(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[product_left_cancellation]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ~ equalish(e_1,e_2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[e_1_is_not_e_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | equalish(X2,X4) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( product(e_2,e_2,e_1)
    | product(e_2,e_2,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    group_element(e_1),
    element_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ product(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X4) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X4,X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qg3]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ equalish(e_1,e_2),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ product(e_2,X1,e_1)
    | equalish(X1,e_2)
    | product(e_2,e_2,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ group_element(X1)
    | product(X1,e_1,e_2)
    | product(X1,e_1,e_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,e_2,e_1)
    | equalish(X1,e_2)
    | product(e_2,e_2,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X4,X1,X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ product(e_2,e_1,e_1)
    | product(e_2,e_2,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( product(e_2,e_1,e_1)
    | product(e_2,e_1,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ product(e_1,e_2,e_1)
    | product(e_2,e_2,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(e_2,X1,e_2)
    | product(e_1,e_2,X1)
    | product(e_2,e_2,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( product(e_2,e_2,e_2)
    | product(e_2,e_1,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    product(e_2,e_2,e_2),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(e_2,X1,e_2)
    | equalish(X1,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(e_2,e_1,e_2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    product(e_2,e_1,e_1),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,e_1,e_1)
    | equalish(X1,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( product(e_1,e_1,e_1)
    | product(e_1,e_1,e_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ~ product(e_1,e_1,e_1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(e_1,X1,e_2)
    | product(e_1,e_1,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    product(e_1,e_1,e_2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP135-1.002 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:03:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % new_bool_3 with pid 2454502 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2454508 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.10/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 54
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.10/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 46
% 0.10/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.10/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 74
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 70
% 0.10/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.10/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 71
% 0.10/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 9
% 0.10/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 33
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.10/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.10/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.10/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 84
% 0.10/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77
% 0.10/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.10/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.10/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1045
% 0.10/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 28
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------