↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GRP135-2.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:04:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.06s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem  : GRP135-2.002 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.06/0.26  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.06/0.26  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 12:10:24 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.27  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.06/0.27  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.06/0.27  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.06/0.27  #
% 0.06/0.27  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.06/0.27  # Number of axioms: 12 Number of unprocessed: 12
% 0.06/0.27  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.06/0.27  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.06/0.27  # Hello from C++
% 0.06/0.27  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.06/0.27  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.06/0.27  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.06/0.27  # 12 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.06/0.27  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.06/0.27  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.06/0.27  # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.06/0.27  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.06/0.27  # 6 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.06/0.27  # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.06/0.27  
% 0.06/0.27  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.06/0.27  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.06/0.27  # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.06/0.27  # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.06/0.28  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.06/0.28  
% 0.06/0.28  # End clausification derivation
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (group_element(e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (group_element(e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (next(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (greater(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~product(X1,e_1,X2)|~greater(X2,X3)|~next(X1,X3))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,X2,X4)|~product(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X2,X3,X4)|~product(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X1)|~product(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (product(X1,X2,e_2)|product(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.06/0.28  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.06/0.28  # Found 9 steps
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (product(e_1,e_1,e_2)|product(e_1,e_1,e_1)|~group_element(e_1)|~group_element(e_1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (product(e_1,e_1,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (equalish(e_1,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (~product(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_109, plain, (~product(e_1,e_1,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_87])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (product(e_1,e_1,e_1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_88, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_108, plain, (~product(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_108, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  # End printing tableau
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS output end
% 0.06/0.28  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.06/0.28  
% 0.06/0.28  # End clausification derivation
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (group_element(e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (group_element(e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (next(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (greater(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~product(X1,e_1,X2)|~greater(X2,X3)|~next(X1,X3))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,X2,X4)|~product(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X2,X3,X4)|~product(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X1)|~product(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (product(X1,X2,e_2)|product(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.06/0.28  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.06/0.28  # Found 13 steps
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (product(e_2,e_2,e_2)|~product(e_1,e_2,e_2)|~product(e_2,e_2,e_1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (product(e_2,e_2,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (product(e_2,e_2,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (~product(e_2,e_2,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (equalish(e_1,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (~product(e_2,e_2,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~product(e_2,e_2,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~product(e_1,e_2,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~group_element(e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~product(e_2,e_2,e_1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_27, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~product(e_2,e_1,e_2)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_65, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (product(e_1,e_2,e_1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_76, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  # End printing tableau
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS output end
% 0.06/0.28  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.06/0.28  
% 0.06/0.28  # End clausification derivation
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (group_element(e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (group_element(e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (next(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (greater(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~equalish(e_1,e_2))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~equalish(e_2,e_1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~product(X1,e_1,X2)|~greater(X2,X3)|~next(X1,X3))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X3,X2,X4)|~product(X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~product(X2,X3,X4)|~product(X1,X3,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X1)|~product(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (product(X1,X2,e_2)|product(X1,X2,e_1)|~group_element(X2)|~group_element(X1))).
% 0.06/0.28  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.06/0.28  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.06/0.28  # Found 16 steps
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (product(e_1,e_1,e_2)|~product(e_2,e_1,e_1)|~product(e_1,e_2,e_2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (product(e_1,e_1,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (equalish(e_1,e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~product(e_2,e_1,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~group_element(e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (product(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~product(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_60])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~product(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (~product(e_2,e_1,e_2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (product(e_2,e_1,e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (~group_element(e_1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (~group_element(e_2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~product(e_1,e_2,e_2)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_27, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (equalish(e_1,e_1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_63, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~product(e_1,e_1,e_2)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])).
% 0.06/0.28  # End printing tableau
% 0.06/0.28  # SZS output end
% 0.06/0.28  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.06/0.28  # Child (22470) has found a proof.
% 0.06/0.28  
% 0.06/0.28  # Proof search is over...
% 0.06/0.28  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------