%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : GRP139-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:31:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.42s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 22 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 21 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 0 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(a,c) = c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_glb1b_1_1) ).
fof(f18,plain,
c = greatest_lower_bound(a,c),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(b,c) = c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_glb1b_2_2) ).
fof(f20,plain,
c = greatest_lower_bound(b,c),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),c) != c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ax_glb1b) ).
fof(f22,plain,
c != greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),c),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f21]) ).
tcf(c_70,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
tcf(c_71,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tcf(c_72,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_73,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tcf(c_82,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(a,c) = c,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
tcf(c_83,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(b,c) = c,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),c) != c,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
tcf(c_100,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(c,a) = c,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_73,c_71,c_72,c_70]) ).
tcf(c_101,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(c,b) = c,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_73,c_71,c_72,c_70]) ).
tcf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
greatest_lower_bound(c,greatest_lower_bound(a,b)) != c,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_73,c_71,c_72,c_70]) ).
tcf(c_139,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(a,c) != c,
inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_101,c_72,c_70,c_73,c_71]) ).
tcf(c_140,plain,
$false,
inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_100,c_72,c_70,c_73,c_71]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GRP139-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 13:51:04 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.40 Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.41
% 0.09/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.41
% 0.09/0.41 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.42 % Proving...
% 2.42/1.16 WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 2.42/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.42/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.42/1.16 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.42/1.16 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % ------ Preprocessing...%
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.42/1.16
% 2.42/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------