%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : GRP143-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:24:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 13 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).
cnf(prove_ax_glb2b,negated_conjecture,
greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),a) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ax_glb2b) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).
cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
glb_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_lub ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),a) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
prove_ax_glb2b ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_glb ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
lub_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
greatest_lower_bound(a,greatest_lower_bound(a,b)) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP143-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 18:25:17 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72 % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------