↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP149-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.93s
% Output   : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem  : GRP149-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.08/0.09  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 23:52:25 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.30  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.08/0.30  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.08/0.30  Mon Jun 13 23:52:25 2022
% 0.08/0.30  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 30227.
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.08/0.30  set(auto).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.08/0.30  clear(print_given).
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  list(usable).
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.08/0.30  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.08/0.30     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  ------------> process usable:
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  ------------> process sos:
% 0.08/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [copy,8,flip.1] {-} greatest_lower_bound(A,B)=greatest_lower_bound(B,A).
% 0.08/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [copy,9,flip.1] {-} least_upper_bound(A,B)=least_upper_bound(B,A).
% 0.08/0.30    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [copy,36,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.08/0.30  
% 0.08/0.30  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.33  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.33  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.33  number of clauses in intial UL: 0
% 0.14/0.33  number of clauses initially in problem: 34
% 0.14/0.33  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 0
% 0.14/0.33  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 0
% 0.14/0.33  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.33  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.14/0.33     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.33     distinct function count: 4
% 0.14/0.33     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.76/0.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 7 [ 2 1 116 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 8 [ 1 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 9 [ 2 1 177 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 12 [ 1 12 197907 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 13 [ 1 8 136566 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.61 sec ----> 91 [binary,89.1,88.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/0.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  1 [] {-} least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c)!=c.
% 0.76/0.93  8 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(A,B)=greatest_lower_bound(B,A).
% 0.76/0.93  9 [] {+} least_upper_bound(A,B)=least_upper_bound(B,A).
% 0.76/0.93  13 [] {-} least_upper_bound(A,least_upper_bound(B,C))=least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(A,B),C).
% 0.76/0.93  15,14 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(A,B),C)=least_upper_bound(A,least_upper_bound(B,C)).
% 0.76/0.93  20 [] {+} least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B))=A.
% 0.76/0.93  32 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(a,c)=a.
% 0.76/0.93  34 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(b,c)=b.
% 0.76/0.93  37 [back_demod,1,demod,15] {-} least_upper_bound(a,least_upper_bound(b,c))!=c.
% 0.76/0.93  40 [para_into,8.1.1,34.1.1,flip.1] {+} greatest_lower_bound(c,b)=b.
% 0.76/0.93  42 [para_into,8.1.1,32.1.1,flip.1] {+} greatest_lower_bound(c,a)=a.
% 0.76/0.93  62,61 [para_from,40.1.1,20.1.1.2] {+} least_upper_bound(c,b)=c.
% 0.76/0.93  73 [para_into,37.1.1.2,9.1.1,demod,62] {+} least_upper_bound(a,c)!=c.
% 0.76/0.93  88 [para_into,73.1.1,9.1.1] {-} least_upper_bound(c,a)!=c.
% 0.76/0.93  89 [para_from,42.1.1,20.1.1.2] {-} least_upper_bound(c,a)=c.
% 0.76/0.93  91 [binary,89.1,88.1] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.93  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  true clauses given           2      (11.1%)
% 0.76/0.93  false clauses given         16
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.76/0.93     5  1         1
% 0.76/0.93     7  1         4
% 0.76/0.93     8  1         0
% 0.76/0.93     9  1         4
% 0.76/0.93    11  8         2
% 0.76/0.93    13  6         2
% 0.76/0.93  tot:  18        13      (41.9% true)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Model 13 [ 1 8 136566 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/0.93  
% 0.76/0.93  Process 30227 finished Mon Jun 13 23:52:26 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------