↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP150-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hcXuQjntOj true

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:35:50 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12  % Problem  : GRP150-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.05/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hcXuQjntOj true
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:21:38 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.37  % Running in FO mode
% 0.44/0.74  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.44/0.74  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.44/0.74  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.47/0.88  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.88  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.92  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.47/0.92  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.47/0.93  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.48/0.94  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.48/0.99  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.48/0.99  % BCE start: 16
% 0.48/0.99  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.48/0.99  % PE start: 16
% 0.48/0.99  logic: eq
% 0.48/0.99  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.48/0.99  % done 18 iterations in 0.031s
% 0.48/0.99  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.48/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.99  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(prove_ax_lub2a, conjecture,
% 0.48/0.99    (( least_upper_bound @ a @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) ) =
% 0.48/0.99     ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ))).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.48/0.99    (( least_upper_bound @ a @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) ) !=
% 0.48/0.99     ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b )),
% 0.48/0.99    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ax_lub2a])).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.48/0.99      (((least_upper_bound @ a @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))
% 0.48/0.99         != (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 0.48/0.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(idempotence_of_lub, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ X @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.48/0.99      (![X0 : $i]: ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.48/0.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [idempotence_of_lub])).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(associativity_of_lub, axiom,
% 0.48/0.99    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.48/0.99     ( least_upper_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.48/0.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.99         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.48/0.99           = (least_upper_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.48/0.99      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_lub])).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zip_derived_cl63, plain,
% 0.48/0.99      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.48/0.99         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.48/0.99           = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.48/0.99      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zip_derived_cl69, plain,
% 0.48/0.99      (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) != (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 0.48/0.99      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl63])).
% 0.48/0.99  thf(zip_derived_cl70, plain, ($false),
% 0.48/0.99      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl69])).
% 0.48/0.99  
% 0.48/0.99  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.48/0.99  
% 0.48/0.99  
% 0.48/0.99  % Terminating...
% 1.86/1.15  % Runner terminated.
% 2.04/1.18  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------