↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP162-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:31:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.30s 11.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  33 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn  37   !;   0   ?;  23   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_transa_1) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    b = least_upper_bound(a,b),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(b,c) = c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_transa_2) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    c = least_upper_bound(b,c),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(a,c) != c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ax_transa) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    c != least_upper_bound(a,c),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,c) = c,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(a,c) != c,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,a) = b,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_72,c_70,c_73,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    least_upper_bound(c,b) = c,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_72,c_70,c_73,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(c,a) != c,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_72,c_70,c_73,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_213,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_225,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(b,least_upper_bound(X0,a)) = least_upper_bound(X0,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_213]) ).

tcf(c_249,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_213,c_77]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(b,least_upper_bound(a,X0)) = least_upper_bound(X0,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_225]) ).

tcf(c_672,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(a,least_upper_bound(X0,b)) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_249]) ).

tcf(c_698,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,c) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_672]) ).

tcf(c_702,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,a) = a,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_698,c_73,c_71,c_72,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_724,plain,
    least_upper_bound(c,a) = c,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_702,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_727,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_724,c_102]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP162-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.38  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 13:54:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/10.42  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.15/10.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.43  
% 0.15/10.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/10.43  
% 0.15/10.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/10.44  % Proving...
% 0.30/11.09  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 0.30/11.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/11.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.30/11.09  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.30/11.09  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Proving...
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % 
% 0.30/11.09  % clauses                               18
% 0.30/11.09  % conjectures                           1
% 0.30/11.09  % EPR                                   0
% 0.30/11.09  % Horn                                  18
% 0.30/11.09  % unary                                 18
% 0.30/11.09  % binary                                0
% 0.30/11.09  % lits                                  18
% 0.30/11.09  % lits eq                               18
% 0.30/11.09  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.30/11.09  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.30/11.09  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.30/11.09  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.30/11.09  % AC symbols                            2
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ 
% 0.30/11.09  % Current options:
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % ------ Proving...
% 0.30/11.09  % 
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.30/11.09  
% 0.30/11.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------