%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP166-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WjykxEERCi true
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:35:52 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.24s 1.40s
% Output : Refutation 5.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP166-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WjykxEERCi true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 14:15:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.34/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.34/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.34/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.37/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.37/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.37/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.37/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.37/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.37/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.37/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 5.24/1.40 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 5.24/1.40 % BCE start: 18
% 5.24/1.40 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 5.24/1.40 % PE start: 18
% 5.24/1.40 logic: eq
% 5.24/1.40 % PE eliminated: 0
% 5.24/1.40 % done 225 iterations in 0.628s
% 5.24/1.40 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 5.24/1.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.24/1.40 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(identity_type, type, identity: $i).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(prove_lat3b, conjecture,
% 5.24/1.40 (( greatest_lower_bound @ a @ ( multiply @ b @ a ) ) = ( a ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 5.24/1.40 (( greatest_lower_bound @ a @ ( multiply @ b @ a ) ) != ( a )),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_lat3b])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (((greatest_lower_bound @ a @ (multiply @ b @ a)) != (a))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(lat3b_2, axiom, (( greatest_lower_bound @ b @ identity ) = ( identity ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (((greatest_lower_bound @ b @ identity) = (identity))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lat3b_2])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(lub_absorbtion, axiom,
% 5.24/1.40 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 5.24/1.40 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lub_absorbtion])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ b @ identity) = (b))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 5.24/1.40 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 5.24/1.40 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl79, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ identity @ b) = (b))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl39, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(monotony_lub2, axiom,
% 5.24/1.40 (( multiply @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 5.24/1.40 ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.24/1.40 ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 5.24/1.40 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub2])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(glb_absorbtion, axiom,
% 5.24/1.40 (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 5.24/1.40 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.24/1.40 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X0) @
% 5.24/1.40 (multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 5.24/1.40 = (multiply @ X2 @ X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl2668, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i]:
% 5.24/1.40 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ identity @ X0) @
% 5.24/1.40 (multiply @ b @ X0)) = (multiply @ identity @ X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl79, zip_derived_cl119])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(left_identity, axiom, (( multiply @ identity @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ identity @ X0) = (X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_identity])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ identity @ X0) = (X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_identity])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl2698, plain,
% 5.24/1.40 (![X0 : $i]: ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (multiply @ b @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 5.24/1.40 [zip_derived_cl2668, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl2707, plain, (((a) != (a))),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl2698])).
% 5.24/1.40 thf(zip_derived_cl2708, plain, ($false),
% 5.24/1.40 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2707])).
% 5.24/1.40
% 5.24/1.40 % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.24/1.40
% 5.24/1.40
% 5.24/1.40 % Terminating...
% 5.82/1.50 % Runner terminated.
% 5.82/1.51 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------