↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP170-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:38:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.48s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  49 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   49 (  48 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(monotony_glb2,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb2) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

cnf(p03b_1,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p03b_1) ).

cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

cnf(associativity_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

cnf(p03b_2,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,d) = c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p03b_2) ).

cnf(monotony_glb1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb1) ).

cnf(prove_p03b,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(multiply(a,c),multiply(b,d)) != multiply(a,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p03b) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X1))),X1) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    monotony_glb2 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    lub_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_lub1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),inverse(X2))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = a,
    p03b_1 ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    glb_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),least_upper_bound(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = least_upper_bound(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,inverse(b))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(a),inverse(b)) = inverse(a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,d) = c,
    p03b_2 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X3),X1))) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3),multiply(inverse(X3),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_34]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(inverse(a),inverse(b)) = inverse(b),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_glb1 ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,greatest_lower_bound(d,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(c,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_20]),c_0_20]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(multiply(a,c),multiply(b,d)) != multiply(a,c),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_p03b]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),greatest_lower_bound(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,d))) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(multiply(a,c),multiply(b,d)) != multiply(a,c),
    c_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_20]),c_0_20]),c_0_47]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP170-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:05:44 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.48/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % sh5l with pid 69157 completed with status 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Result found by sh5l
% 1.48/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.48/0.63  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.48/0.63  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.48/0.63  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 69159 completed with status 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.48/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.48/0.63  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.48/0.63  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.48/0.63  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.48/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.48/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.48/0.63  
% 1.48/0.63  % Proof found!
% 1.48/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.48/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.48/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 18
% 1.48/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 18
% 1.48/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 1.48/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 1153
% 1.48/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 438
% 1.48/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 379
% 1.48/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 336
% 1.48/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 34
% 1.48/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 28606
% 1.48/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16192
% 1.48/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 28606
% 1.48/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 33663
% 1.48/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 25248
% 1.48/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.48/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.48/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.48/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.48/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.48/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 302
% 1.48/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 278
% 1.48/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 23
% 1.48/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 1.48/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15008
% 1.48/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 15008
% 1.48/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 34
% 1.48/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 52
% 1.48/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 812
% 1.48/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 369
% 1.48/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.48/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 283372
% 1.48/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 1.48/0.63  
% 1.48/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.48/0.63  % User time                : 0.136 s
% 1.48/0.63  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 1.48/0.63  % Total time               : 0.149 s
% 1.48/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 3896 pages
% 1.48/0.63  
% 1.48/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.48/0.63  % User time                : 0.138 s
% 1.48/0.63  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 1.48/0.63  % Total time               : 0.155 s
% 1.48/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.48/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------