%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP170-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pOTOhquMSX true
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:35:54 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.04s 1.82s
% Output : Refutation 9.04s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : GRP170-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.02/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pOTOhquMSX true
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 14:07:53 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.32 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.32 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.32 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.32 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33 % Running in FO mode
% 0.46/0.56 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.46/0.56 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.46/0.56 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.46/0.67 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.46/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.46/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.46/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.46/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 9.04/1.82 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 9.04/1.82 % BCE start: 18
% 9.04/1.82 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 9.04/1.82 % PE start: 18
% 9.04/1.82 logic: eq
% 9.04/1.82 % PE eliminated: 0
% 9.04/1.82 % done 217 iterations in 1.121s
% 9.04/1.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 9.04/1.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.04/1.82 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(p03d_1, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) = ( b ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) = (b))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p03d_1])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(p03d_2, axiom, (( greatest_lower_bound @ c @ d ) = ( c ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (((greatest_lower_bound @ c @ d) = (c))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p03d_2])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(monotony_glb1, axiom,
% 9.04/1.82 (( multiply @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 9.04/1.82 ( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ ( multiply @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((multiply @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 9.04/1.82 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @
% 9.04/1.82 (multiply @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_glb1])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(symmetry_of_glb, axiom,
% 9.04/1.82 (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_glb])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(lub_absorbtion, axiom,
% 9.04/1.82 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lub_absorbtion])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl200, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X0) @
% 9.04/1.82 (multiply @ X2 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0)))
% 9.04/1.82 = (multiply @ X2 @ X0))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl2367, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ d) @ (multiply @ X0 @ c))
% 9.04/1.82 = (multiply @ X0 @ d))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl200])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 9.04/1.82 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl2672, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ c) @ (multiply @ X0 @ d))
% 9.04/1.82 = (multiply @ X0 @ d))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2367, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(monotony_lub2, axiom,
% 9.04/1.82 (( multiply @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 9.04/1.82 ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 9.04/1.82 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub2])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(associativity_of_lub, axiom,
% 9.04/1.82 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 9.04/1.82 ( least_upper_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 9.04/1.82 = (least_upper_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_lub])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X0) @
% 9.04/1.82 (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))
% 9.04/1.82 = (least_upper_bound @
% 9.04/1.82 (multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X2 @ X1) @ X0) @ X3))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl3058, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X1 @ c) @ (multiply @ X0 @ d))
% 9.04/1.82 = (least_upper_bound @
% 9.04/1.82 (multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) @ c) @
% 9.04/1.82 (multiply @ X0 @ d)))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)],
% 9.04/1.82 [zip_derived_cl2672, zip_derived_cl118])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl3535, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 9.04/1.82 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ b @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d)))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl3058])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl2672, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (![X0 : $i]:
% 9.04/1.82 ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ c) @ (multiply @ X0 @ d))
% 9.04/1.82 = (multiply @ X0 @ d))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2367, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl3578, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 9.04/1.82 = (multiply @ b @ d))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 9.04/1.82 [zip_derived_cl3535, zip_derived_cl2672])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(prove_p03d, conjecture,
% 9.04/1.82 (( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ d ) ) =
% 9.04/1.82 ( multiply @ b @ d ))).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 9.04/1.82 (( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ d ) ) !=
% 9.04/1.82 ( multiply @ b @ d )),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_p03d])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 9.04/1.82 (((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 9.04/1.82 != (multiply @ b @ d))),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 9.04/1.82 thf(zip_derived_cl3579, plain, ($false),
% 9.04/1.82 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 9.04/1.82 [zip_derived_cl3578, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 9.04/1.82
% 9.04/1.82 % SZS output end Refutation
% 9.04/1.82
% 9.04/1.82
% 9.04/1.82 % Terminating...
% 9.18/1.89 % Runner terminated.
% 9.18/1.92 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------