↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP170-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:31:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.68s 2.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   70 (  70 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  125 (  69 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   80 (   0 sgn  80   !;   0   ?;  59   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] : least_upper_bound(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',idempotence_of_lub) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb1) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X2),multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb2) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p03d_1) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    b = least_upper_bound(a,b),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,d) = c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p03d_2) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    c = greatest_lower_bound(c,d),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(multiply(a,c),multiply(b,d)) != multiply(b,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p03d) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    multiply(b,d) != least_upper_bound(multiply(a,c),multiply(b,d)),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(c,d) = c,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(multiply(a,c),multiply(b,d)) != multiply(b,d),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_141,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = multiply(a,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_142,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = multiply(b,d),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_143,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_144,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = greatest_lower_bound(c,d),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_145,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = least_upper_bound(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_146,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_12 != iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_142,c_141,c_143]) ).

tcf(c_150,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).

tcf(c_154,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_77]) ).

tcf(c_155,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_158,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_159,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_160,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_161,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).

tcf(c_162,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_144]) ).

tcf(c_163,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_145]) ).

tcf(c_243,plain,
    multiply(a,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_141,c_162]) ).

tcf(c_244,plain,
    multiply(iPr_def_14,d) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_163]) ).

tcf(c_245,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_13,d) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_162]) ).

tcf(c_246,plain,
    least_upper_bound(a,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_163]) ).

tcf(c_247,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,a) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_158,c_160,c_159,c_161]) ).

tcf(c_248,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_160]) ).

tcf(c_249,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_159,c_161]) ).

tcf(c_266,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_276,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = least_upper_bound(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_158]) ).

tcf(c_298,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,multiply(X0,d)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_14,X0),d),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_244,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_358,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_10,multiply(a,X0)) = multiply(a,greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_13,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_243,c_152]) ).

tcf(c_447,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,least_upper_bound(X0,iPr_def_11)) = least_upper_bound(X0,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_248]) ).

tcf(c_507,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_249,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_686,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,iPr_def_14) = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_247,c_266]) ).

tcf(c_756,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_276]) ).

tcf(c_838,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_447,c_276]) ).

tcf(c_951,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_14,a) = a,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_686,c_158,c_160,c_159,c_161]) ).

tcf(c_953,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_838,c_756]) ).

tcf(c_4954,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,multiply(a,d)) = multiply(a,d),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_951,c_298]) ).

tcf(c_5561,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_10,multiply(a,d)) = multiply(a,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_245,c_358]) ).

tcf(c_5677,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(iPr_def_11,greatest_lower_bound(X0,multiply(a,d))) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4954,c_507]) ).

tcf(c_5773,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_10,multiply(a,d)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5561,c_243]) ).

tcf(c_6125,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5773,c_5677]) ).

tcf(c_6237,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6125,c_158,c_160,c_159,c_161]) ).

tcf(c_6238,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6237,c_953]) ).

tcf(c_6541,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6238,c_146]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP170-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 13:58:11 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 7.68/2.19  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 7.68/2.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/2.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.68/2.19  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.68/2.19  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Proving...
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % 
% 7.68/2.19  % clauses                               23
% 7.68/2.19  % conjectures                           1
% 7.68/2.19  % EPR                                   3
% 7.68/2.19  % Horn                                  23
% 7.68/2.19  % unary                                 23
% 7.68/2.19  % binary                                0
% 7.68/2.19  % lits                                  23
% 7.68/2.19  % lits eq                               23
% 7.68/2.19  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.68/2.19  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.68/2.19  % fd_cond                               0
% 7.68/2.19  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 7.68/2.19  % AC symbols                            2
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ 
% 7.68/2.19  % Current options:
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % ------ Proving...
% 7.68/2.19  % 
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.68/2.19  
% 7.68/2.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.68/2.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------