↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP173-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:31:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.70s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  54 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  53 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   0 sgn  79   !;   0   ?;  50   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ! [X0] : identity = multiply(inverse(X0),X0),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(multiply(X0,X1),X2) = multiply(X0,multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X2),multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X2),multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb2) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(identity,a) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p05a_1) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    identity = least_upper_bound(identity,a),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(a)) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p05a_2) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    identity = least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(a)),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    identity != a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p05a) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiply(multiply(X0,X1),X2) = multiply(X0,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,a) = identity,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(a)) = identity,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    identity != a,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_228,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(X0),X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_78]) ).

tcf(c_244,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(X0),least_upper_bound(X0,X1))) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_77]) ).

tcf(c_261,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_269,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_77]) ).

tcf(c_283,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(X0),least_upper_bound(X1,X0))) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_244]) ).

tcf(c_305,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),identity)) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_283]) ).

tcf(c_412,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(inverse(a),identity) = inverse(a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_269]) ).

tcf(c_429,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(a)) = inverse(a),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_412,c_73,c_71,c_72,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_467,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(multiply(inverse(a),identity),X0)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_305,c_72]) ).

tcf(c_474,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X0))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_261]) ).

tcf(c_521,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(multiply(inverse(a),identity),X0)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),identity)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_467]) ).

tcf(c_529,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(multiply(inverse(a),identity),X0)) = identity,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_521,c_305]) ).

tcf(c_1700,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(least_upper_bound(inverse(a),X0),identity)) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_529]) ).

tcf(c_2107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,multiply(X1,X0)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_81]) ).

tcf(c_2138,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(inverse(a),X0)),identity) = identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1700,c_2107]) ).

tcf(c_2230,plain,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(a)),identity) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_2138]) ).

tcf(c_2240,plain,
    multiply(inverse(a),identity) = identity,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2230,c_429]) ).

tcf(c_2428,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(a),multiply(identity,X0)) = multiply(identity,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2240,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_2437,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(a),X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2428,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_2460,plain,
    identity = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2437,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_2466,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2460,c_84]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP173-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 13:58:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 3.70/1.20  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 3.70/1.20  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.70/1.20  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.70/1.20  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Proving...
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % 
% 3.70/1.20  % clauses                               18
% 3.70/1.20  % conjectures                           1
% 3.70/1.20  % EPR                                   1
% 3.70/1.20  % Horn                                  18
% 3.70/1.20  % unary                                 18
% 3.70/1.20  % binary                                0
% 3.70/1.20  % lits                                  18
% 3.70/1.20  % lits eq                               18
% 3.70/1.20  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.70/1.20  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.70/1.20  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.70/1.20  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.70/1.20  % AC symbols                            2
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ 
% 3.70/1.20  % Current options:
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % ------ Proving...
% 3.70/1.20  % 
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.70/1.20  
% 3.70/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------