↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : GRP176-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:41:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (  20 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
    multiply(X,least_upper_bound(Y,Z)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X,Y),multiply(X,Z)),
    file('GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

cnf(monotony_lub2,axiom,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(Y,Z),X) = least_upper_bound(multiply(Y,X),multiply(Z,X)),
    file('GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

cnf(prove_p07,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(c,multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d)) != least_upper_bound(multiply(c,multiply(a,d)),multiply(c,multiply(b,d))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_p07) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_4,axiom,
    ( multiply(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1) = multiply(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    multiply(c,multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d)) != least_upper_bound(multiply(c,multiply(a,d)),multiply(c,multiply(b,d))),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_p07]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( multiply(c,least_upper_bound(multiply(a,d),multiply(b,d))) != least_upper_bound(multiply(c,multiply(a,d)),multiply(c,multiply(b,d)))
    | multiply(c,multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d)) != multiply(c,least_upper_bound(multiply(a,d),multiply(b,d)))
    | multiply(c,multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(c,multiply(a,d)),multiply(c,multiply(b,d))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d) != least_upper_bound(multiply(a,d),multiply(b,d))
    | c != c
    | multiply(c,multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d)) = multiply(c,least_upper_bound(multiply(a,d),multiply(b,d))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_4]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    c = c,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(a,b),d) = least_upper_bound(multiply(a,d),multiply(b,d)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[monotony_lub2]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    multiply(c,least_upper_bound(multiply(a,d),multiply(b,d))) = least_upper_bound(multiply(c,multiply(a,d)),multiply(c,multiply(b,d))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[monotony_lub1]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t2:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP176-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 08:53:53 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------