%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP178-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:05:15 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 147.46s 19.06s % Output : CNFRefutation 147.46s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GRP178-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 07:29:24 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 20 Number of unprocessed: 20 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 20 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 20 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 20 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.12/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.12/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 29 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.37 # We now have 29 tableaux to operate on % 147.46/19.06 # There were 10 total branch saturation attempts. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 147.46/19.06 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 147.46/19.06 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 147.46/19.06 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 147.46/19.06 # Begin clausification derivation % 147.46/19.06 % 147.46/19.06 # End clausification derivation % 147.46/19.06 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(a,b)=identity)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(identity,a)=a)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(identity,b)=b)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (least_upper_bound(identity,c)=c)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X1)=X1)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2))=X1)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3)=greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3)=least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X3),X2))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3))=multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))=multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X3),X2))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)=greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (least_upper_bound(X1,X2)=least_upper_bound(X2,X1))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (greatest_lower_bound(a,multiply(b,c))!=greatest_lower_bound(a,c))). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (X4=X4)). % 147.46/19.06 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 147.46/19.06 # Begin printing tableau % 147.46/19.06 # Found 5 steps % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (greatest_lower_bound(a,b)=identity), inference(start_rule)). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(a,b)=identity), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_87, plain, (greatest_lower_bound(a,b)!=identity), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_39])). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_86, plain, (least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),greatest_lower_bound(a,b))=least_upper_bound(identity,identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_47])). % 147.46/19.06 cnf(i_0_2186712, plain, (inverse(least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),greatest_lower_bound(a,b)))=inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,identity))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_2186712, ...])). % 147.46/19.06 # End printing tableau % 147.46/19.06 # SZS output end % 147.46/19.06 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 148.26/19.08 # Child (18995) has found a proof. % 148.26/19.08 % 148.26/19.08 # Proof search is over... % 148.26/19.08 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------