↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP179-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:38:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.33s 2.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   72 (  72 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   72 (  71 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  120 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p18_3,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_3) ).

cnf(p18_1,hypothesis,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_1) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(p18_2,hypothesis,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_2) ).

cnf(monotony_glb1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb1) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

cnf(monotony_glb2,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb2) ).

cnf(associativity_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

cnf(idempotence_of_gld,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',idempotence_of_gld) ).

cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

cnf(prove_p18,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(a),identity) != inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p18) ).

cnf(associativity_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(X1)),
    p18_3 ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    p18_1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),identity) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    p18_2 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_glb1 ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_lub1 ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    monotony_glb2 ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(X1))) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_23]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X1) = X1,
    idempotence_of_gld ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    lub_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    glb_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_21]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_17]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),least_upper_bound(X1,identity)) = least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_25]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),inverse(X2))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3))) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,X1))) = inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_39]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X2,identity),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_19]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,hypothesis,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,identity),inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),greatest_lower_bound(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(X1,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_43]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_43]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(a),identity) != inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_p18]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),least_upper_bound(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = least_upper_bound(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(X1,inverse(least_upper_bound(X2,X1)))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity),greatest_lower_bound(X1,inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,X2)))) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1)))) = inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_24]),c_0_45]),c_0_19]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_26]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(a),identity) != inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),
    c_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_62,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(least_upper_bound(X2,X1))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity),inverse(least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1)))) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_65,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2))) = inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity))) = inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_60]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(greatest_lower_bound(identity,a)) != least_upper_bound(inverse(a),identity),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,hypothesis,
    inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity)) = least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_21]),c_0_64]),c_0_65]),c_0_66]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(greatest_lower_bound(identity,a)) != least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(a)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,hypothesis,
    inverse(greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1)) = least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP179-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.92  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.92  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.92  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.92  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.92  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.92  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.92  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.92  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:04:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.93  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.93  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.97  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.97  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.33/2.22  % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.33/2.22  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.33/2.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1370428 completed with status 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.33/2.22  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.33/2.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.33/2.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.33/2.22  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 8.33/2.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1370437 completed with status 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 8.33/2.22  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.33/2.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.33/2.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.33/2.22  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 8.33/2.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 8.33/2.22  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 8.33/2.22  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.33/2.22  
% 8.33/2.22  % Proof found!
% 8.33/2.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.33/2.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.33/2.22  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 8.33/2.22  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Initial clauses                      : 19
% 8.33/2.22  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 8.33/2.22  % Processed clauses                    : 3646
% 8.33/2.22  % ...of these trivial                  : 1836
% 8.33/2.22  % ...subsumed                          : 1276
% 8.33/2.22  % ...remaining for further processing  : 534
% 8.33/2.22  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Backward-rewritten                   : 79
% 8.33/2.22  % Generated clauses                    : 105394
% 8.33/2.22  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 64520
% 8.33/2.22  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Paramodulations                      : 105394
% 8.33/2.22  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % NegExts                              : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Total rewrite steps                  : 154537
% 8.33/2.22  % ...of those cached                   : 125412
% 8.33/2.22  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 8.33/2.22  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 8.33/2.22  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 8.33/2.22  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 8.33/2.22  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 8.33/2.22  % Current number of processed clauses  : 436
% 8.33/2.22  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 389
% 8.33/2.22  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 47
% 8.33/2.22  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 8.33/2.22  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60748
% 8.33/2.22  % ...number of literals in the above   : 60748
% 8.33/2.22  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Current number of archived clauses   : 98
% 8.33/2.22  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 234
% 8.33/2.22  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1731
% 8.33/2.22  % BW rewrite match successes           : 460
% 8.33/2.22  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.33/2.22  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1271320
% 8.33/2.22  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 8.33/2.22  
% 8.33/2.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.33/2.22  % User time                : 1.125 s
% 8.33/2.22  % System time              : 0.057 s
% 8.33/2.22  % Total time               : 1.181 s
% 8.33/2.22  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 8.33/2.22  
% 8.33/2.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.33/2.22  % User time                : 5.457 s
% 8.33/2.22  % System time              : 0.284 s
% 8.33/2.22  % Total time               : 5.741 s
% 8.33/2.22  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 8.33/2.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------