↑ Up

Bliksem---1.12.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : GRP182-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 07:35:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP182-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 08:07:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.70/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.70/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.70/1.09  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Clauses:
% 0.70/1.09  [
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( identity, X ), X ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( inverse( X ), X ), identity ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( multiply( X, Y ), Z ), multiply( X, multiply( Y, Z ) ) )
% 0.70/1.09     ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X ) ) ]
% 0.70/1.09    ,
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ), 'least_upper_bound'( Y, X ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'greatest_lower_bound'( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), Z ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'least_upper_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'least_upper_bound'( 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ), Z ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, X ), X ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, X ), X ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ) ), X ) ]
% 0.70/1.09    ,
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ) ), X ) ]
% 0.70/1.09    ,
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( X, 'least_upper_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 'least_upper_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    multiply( X, Y ), multiply( X, Z ) ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'greatest_lower_bound'( multiply( X, Y ), multiply( X, Z ) ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ), Z ), 'least_upper_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    multiply( X, Z ), multiply( Y, Z ) ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( multiply( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), Z ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'greatest_lower_bound'( multiply( X, Z ), multiply( Y, Z ) ) ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( inverse( identity ), identity ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( inverse( inverse( X ) ), X ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ =( inverse( multiply( X, Y ) ), multiply( inverse( Y ), inverse( X ) )
% 0.70/1.09     ) ],
% 0.70/1.09     [ ~( =( 'least_upper_bound'( identity, 'greatest_lower_bound'( a, 
% 0.70/1.09    identity ) ), identity ) ) ]
% 0.70/1.09  ] .
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.70/1.09  This is a pure equality problem
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Options Used:
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  useres =            1
% 0.70/1.09  useparamod =        1
% 0.70/1.09  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.70/1.09  useeqfact =         1
% 0.70/1.09  usefactor =         1
% 0.70/1.09  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.70/1.09  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.70/1.09  usesimpres =        3
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.70/1.09  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.70/1.09  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.70/1.09  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.70/1.09  selectoldest =      5
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.70/1.09  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  termordering =      kbo
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  litapriori =        0
% 0.70/1.09  termapriori =       1
% 0.70/1.09  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.70/1.09  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.70/1.09  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.70/1.09  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  litselect =         negord
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  maxweight =         15
% 0.70/1.09  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.70/1.09  maxlength =         115
% 0.70/1.09  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.70/1.09  excuselevel =       1
% 0.70/1.09  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.70/1.09  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  showgenerated =    0
% 0.70/1.09  showkept =         0
% 0.70/1.09  showselected =     0
% 0.70/1.09  showdeleted =      0
% 0.70/1.09  showresimp =       1
% 0.70/1.09  showstatus =       2000
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  prologoutput =     1
% 0.70/1.09  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.70/1.09  totalproof =       1
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  identity  [39, 0]      (w:1, o:9, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  multiply  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:46, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  inverse  [42, 1]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  'greatest_lower_bound'  [45, 2]      (w:1, o:47, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  'least_upper_bound'  [46, 2]      (w:1, o:45, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.70/1.09  a  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Starting Search:
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.70/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 3, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, 
% 0.70/1.09    X ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  .
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 9, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ) ), X
% 0.70/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  .
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 18, [ ~( =( 'least_upper_bound'( identity, 'greatest_lower_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    a, identity ) ), identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  .
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 30, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  .
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 46, [] )
% 0.70/1.09  .
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/1.09  found a proof!
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  initialclauses(
% 0.70/1.09  [ clause( 48, [ =( multiply( identity, X ), X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 49, [ =( multiply( inverse( X ), X ), identity ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 50, [ =( multiply( multiply( X, Y ), Z ), multiply( X, multiply( 
% 0.70/1.09    Y, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 51, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    Y, X ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 52, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ), 'least_upper_bound'( Y, X )
% 0.70/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 53, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, Z
% 0.70/1.09     ) ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 54, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'least_upper_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'least_upper_bound'( 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 55, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, X ), X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 56, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, X ), X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 57, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ) )
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 58, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ) )
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 59, [ =( multiply( X, 'least_upper_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'least_upper_bound'( multiply( X, Y ), multiply( X, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 60, [ =( multiply( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, Z ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'greatest_lower_bound'( multiply( X, Y ), multiply( X, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 61, [ =( multiply( 'least_upper_bound'( X, Y ), Z ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'least_upper_bound'( multiply( X, Z ), multiply( Y, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 62, [ =( multiply( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), Z ), 
% 0.70/1.09    'greatest_lower_bound'( multiply( X, Z ), multiply( Y, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 63, [ =( inverse( identity ), identity ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 64, [ =( inverse( inverse( X ) ), X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 65, [ =( inverse( multiply( X, Y ) ), multiply( inverse( Y ), 
% 0.70/1.09    inverse( X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 66, [ ~( =( 'least_upper_bound'( identity, 'greatest_lower_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    a, identity ) ), identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  ] ).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 3, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, 
% 0.70/1.09    X ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 51, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    Y, X ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.70/1.09     )] ) ).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 9, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ) ), X
% 0.70/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 57, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ) )
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.70/1.09     )] ) ).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 18, [ ~( =( 'least_upper_bound'( identity, 'greatest_lower_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    a, identity ) ), identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 66, [ ~( =( 'least_upper_bound'( identity, 'greatest_lower_bound'( 
% 0.70/1.09    a, identity ) ), identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 95, [ =( X, 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y )
% 0.70/1.09     ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 9, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ) )
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] )).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  paramod(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 96, [ =( X, 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X )
% 0.70/1.09     ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 3, [ =( 'greatest_lower_bound'( X, Y ), 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, clause( 95, [ =( X, 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( X
% 0.70/1.09    , Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, 4, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), substitution( 1, [ 
% 0.70/1.09    :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] )).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 99, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 96, [ =( X, 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X
% 0.70/1.09     ) ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] )).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 30, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X ) ), 
% 0.70/1.09    X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 99, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X ) )
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.70/1.09     )] ) ).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  paramod(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 102, [ ~( =( identity, identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 30, [ =( 'least_upper_bound'( X, 'greatest_lower_bound'( Y, X ) )
% 0.70/1.09    , X ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, clause( 18, [ ~( =( 'least_upper_bound'( identity, 
% 0.70/1.09    'greatest_lower_bound'( a, identity ) ), identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, 2, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, identity ), :=( Y, a )] ), substitution( 
% 0.70/1.09    1, [] )).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  eqrefl(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 103, [] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 102, [ ~( =( identity, identity ) ) ] )
% 0.70/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [] )).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.70/1.09  clause( 46, [] )
% 0.70/1.09  , clause( 103, [] )
% 0.70/1.09  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [] ) ).
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  end.
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Memory use:
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  space for terms:        825
% 0.70/1.09  space for clauses:      4674
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  clauses generated:      215
% 0.70/1.09  clauses kept:           47
% 0.70/1.09  clauses selected:       19
% 0.70/1.09  clauses deleted:        1
% 0.70/1.09  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  subsentry:          209
% 0.70/1.09  literals s-matched: 113
% 0.70/1.09  literals matched:   109
% 0.70/1.09  full subsumption:   0
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  checksum:           1169109302
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  
% 0.70/1.09  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------