↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP184-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:38:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 5.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  39 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (  38 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_p21x,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity))) != multiply(inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),least_upper_bound(a,identity)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p21x) ).

cnf(p21x_3,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21x_3) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(p21x_1,hypothesis,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21x_1) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

cnf(p21x_4,hypothesis,
    inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21x_4) ).

cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

cnf(monotony_lub2,axiom,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(associativity_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

cnf(p21x_2,hypothesis,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p21x_2) ).

cnf(associativity_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity))) != multiply(inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),least_upper_bound(a,identity)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_p21x]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(X1)),
    p21x_3 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    p21x_1 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity))) != multiply(inverse(greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),least_upper_bound(a,identity)),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)),
    p21x_4 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_lub1 ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    monotony_lub2 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),identity) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    p21x_2 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
    associativity_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(a,multiply(inverse(a),identity)))) != least_upper_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(multiply(a,identity),least_upper_bound(inverse(a),multiply(a,inverse(a))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_20]),c_0_19]),c_0_21]),c_0_17]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_16]),c_0_23]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_20]),c_0_25]),c_0_20]),c_0_25]),c_0_21]),c_0_17]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_16]),c_0_23]),c_0_16]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(ar,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33,c_0_34,c_0_35,c_0_36,c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP184-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:04:27 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/5.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3295277 completed with status 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/5.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/5.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/5.43  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/5.43  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 3295285 completed with status 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Result found by U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.13/5.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/5.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/5.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/5.43  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/5.43  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/5.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/5.43  
% 0.13/5.43  % Proof found!
% 0.13/5.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/5.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/5.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 21
% 0.13/5.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Initial clauses                      : 21
% 0.13/5.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
% 0.13/5.43  % Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.13/5.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.13/5.43  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 27
% 0.13/5.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.13/5.43  % Generated clauses                    : 171
% 0.13/5.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 103
% 0.13/5.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Paramodulations                      : 171
% 0.13/5.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 206
% 0.13/5.43  % ...of those cached                   : 86
% 0.13/5.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/5.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/5.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/5.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/5.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/5.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.13/5.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22
% 0.13/5.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.13/5.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.13/5.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94
% 0.13/5.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 94
% 0.13/5.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.13/5.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 21
% 0.13/5.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 0.13/5.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/5.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1643
% 0.13/5.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.13/5.43  
% 0.13/5.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/5.43  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.13/5.43  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.13/5.43  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.13/5.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 0.13/5.43  
% 0.13/5.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/5.43  % User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.13/5.43  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.13/5.43  % Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.13/5.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/5.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------