↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP185-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:31:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.38s 1.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   82 (  82 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  168 (  81 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   90 (   0 sgn  90   !;   0   ?;  65   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] : least_upper_bound(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',idempotence_of_lub) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X2),multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X2),multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_glb2) ).

fof(f17,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity))) != multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p22a) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity)) != least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity))),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity))) != multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(identity,least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity)))) != multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_70,c_68,c_71,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_134,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = multiply(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_135,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = least_upper_bound(a,identity),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_136,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = least_upper_bound(b,identity),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_137,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = multiply(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_138,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_139,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = least_upper_bound(identity,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_140,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_15 != iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_136,c_135,c_137,c_134,c_138,c_139]) ).

tcf(c_143,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_144,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).

tcf(c_145,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).

tcf(c_149,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_154,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

tcf(c_155,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

tcf(c_233,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_248,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,multiply(X1,X0)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_144]) ).

tcf(c_273,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(b,iPr_def_12) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_279,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_12,b) = b,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_285,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,a) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_286,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,identity) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_287,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_290,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,iPr_def_11) = identity,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_291,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,identity) = identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_290,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_292,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_286,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_296,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(least_upper_bound(a,X0),b) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,multiply(X0,b)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_145]) ).

tcf(c_297,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,multiply(X1,X0)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(identity,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_145]) ).

tcf(c_302,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),X1) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,identity),X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_145]) ).

tcf(c_311,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,multiply(X1,X0)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,identity),X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_302,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_354,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(iPr_def_11,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,X0)) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_13,multiply(iPr_def_11,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_376,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = least_upper_bound(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_152]) ).

tcf(c_401,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,b) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_279,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_403,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(iPr_def_13,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,X0)) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_152]) ).

tcf(c_404,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_405,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_404,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_466,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(b,least_upper_bound(X0,identity)) = least_upper_bound(X0,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_233]) ).

tcf(c_625,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_405,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_706,plain,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_12) = greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_248]) ).

tcf(c_716,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_706,c_155,c_143,c_291]) ).

tcf(c_799,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_716,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_1605,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,multiply(a,X0)) = multiply(iPr_def_11,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_297]) ).

tcf(c_2410,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,multiply(a,b)) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,multiply(identity,b)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_311,c_296]) ).

tcf(c_2414,plain,
    multiply(iPr_def_11,b) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2410,c_143,c_1605]) ).

tcf(c_4622,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_13,multiply(iPr_def_11,b)) = multiply(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_401,c_354]) ).

tcf(c_4652,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4622,c_137,c_403,c_2414]) ).

tcf(c_4808,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4652,c_376]) ).

tcf(c_4815,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4808,c_625]) ).

tcf(c_4838,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_799,c_4815]) ).

tcf(c_4844,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_4815]) ).

tcf(c_5583,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,iPr_def_15) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_286,c_466]) ).

tcf(c_5602,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_15,b) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5583,c_154,c_4838]) ).

tcf(c_6510,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5602,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_6519,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6510,c_155,c_292]) ).

tcf(c_6520,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6519,c_4844]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP185-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.51  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.51  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.51  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.51  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.51  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.51  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.51  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.51  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 14:03:19 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.51  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.51  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.55  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.08/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.56  
% 0.08/0.56  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.08/0.56  
% 0.08/0.56  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.57  % Proving...
% 8.38/1.80  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 8.38/1.80  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.38/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------  iProver source info
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 8.38/1.80  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 8.38/1.80  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Proving...
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % 
% 8.38/1.80  % clauses                               22
% 8.38/1.80  % conjectures                           1
% 8.38/1.80  % EPR                                   1
% 8.38/1.80  % Horn                                  22
% 8.38/1.80  % unary                                 22
% 8.38/1.80  % binary                                0
% 8.38/1.80  % lits                                  22
% 8.38/1.80  % lits eq                               22
% 8.38/1.80  % fd_pure                               0
% 8.38/1.80  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 8.38/1.80  % fd_cond                               0
% 8.38/1.80  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 8.38/1.80  % AC symbols                            2
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ 
% 8.38/1.80  % Current options:
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % ------ Proving...
% 8.38/1.80  % 
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.38/1.80  
% 8.38/1.80  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------