↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GRP185-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:31:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.30s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   87 (  87 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  168 (  86 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  104 (   0 sgn 104   !;   0   ?;  77   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ! [X0] : identity = multiply(inverse(X0),X0),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(multiply(X0,X1),X2) = multiply(X0,multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X2),multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22b_1) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    identity = inverse(identity),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [X0] : inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22b_2) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : inverse(multiply(X0,X1)) = multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22b_3) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity))) != least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p22b) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity) != greatest_lower_bound(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity))),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiply(multiply(X0,X1),X2) = multiply(X0,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),inverse(X1)) = inverse(multiply(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),multiply(least_upper_bound(a,identity),least_upper_bound(b,identity))) != least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_148,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = multiply(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_149,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,identity),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_150,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = least_upper_bound(a,identity),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_151,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = least_upper_bound(b,identity),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_152,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = multiply(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_153,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_154,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = inverse(identity),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_15 != iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_151,c_150,c_152,c_148,c_149,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_156,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiply(multiply(X0,X1),X2) = multiply(X0,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).

tcf(c_157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

tcf(c_158,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

tcf(c_160,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

tcf(c_162,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).

tcf(c_163,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

tcf(c_167,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_168,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_169,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_170,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_171,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),inverse(X1)) = inverse(multiply(X1,X0)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_172,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : inverse(inverse(X0)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_173,plain,
    iPr_def_16 = identity,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_265,plain,
    inverse(iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_266,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(iPr_def_16,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_267,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_268,plain,
    least_upper_bound(a,iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_269,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,a) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_167,c_169,c_168,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_271,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,b) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_167,c_169,c_168,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_272,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_167,c_169,c_168,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_273,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_274,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_167,c_169]) ).

tcf(c_309,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : inverse(multiply(iPr_def_16,X0)) = multiply(inverse(X0),iPr_def_16),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_265,c_171]) ).

tcf(c_313,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),multiply(X0,X1)) = multiply(iPr_def_16,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_156]) ).

tcf(c_320,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,X0)) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_11,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_267,c_167]) ).

tcf(c_378,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X0,X2))) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_163]) ).

tcf(c_412,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,multiply(X1,X0)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_266,c_160]) ).

tcf(c_495,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),iPr_def_16) = inverse(X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_309,c_266]) ).

tcf(c_497,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(inverse(X0),multiply(X0,X1)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_313,c_266]) ).

tcf(c_848,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiply(X0,iPr_def_16) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_495]) ).

tcf(c_868,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiply(X0,multiply(inverse(X0),X1)) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_497]) ).

tcf(c_872,plain,
    multiply(inverse(a),iPr_def_10) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_497]) ).

tcf(c_875,plain,
    multiply(inverse(iPr_def_12),iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_497]) ).

tcf(c_936,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_11,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_320]) ).

tcf(c_1045,plain,
    least_upper_bound(iPr_def_11,a) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_936,c_167,c_169,c_168,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_1537,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : least_upper_bound(X0,multiply(X0,X1)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_848,c_162]) ).

tcf(c_2239,plain,
    multiply(a,b) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_872,c_868]) ).

tcf(c_2240,plain,
    multiply(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_875,c_868]) ).

tcf(c_2425,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10))) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1045,c_378]) ).

tcf(c_6995,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10),X0)) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_169,c_2425]) ).

tcf(c_7136,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,X0))) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6995,c_167,c_169,c_168,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_9548,plain,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,a),b) = least_upper_bound(b,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2239,c_412]) ).

tcf(c_9639,plain,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(iPr_def_16,a),b) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,b),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_9548,c_167,c_169,c_168,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_9640,plain,
    multiply(iPr_def_12,b) = least_upper_bound(iPr_def_10,b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_9639,c_269]) ).

tcf(c_9904,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(iPr_def_11,least_upper_bound(iPr_def_12,multiply(iPr_def_12,b))) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9640,c_7136]) ).

tcf(c_10077,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_9904,c_170,c_271,c_272,c_1537,c_2240]) ).

tcf(c_10246,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_10077,c_155]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP185-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 14:03:34 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s ueq_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 8.30/1.73  WARNING - Clausifier option not provided in the heuristic config "heur/vip2_118404", setting default options.
% 8.30/1.73  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.30/1.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------  iProver source info
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 8.30/1.73  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 8.30/1.73  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Proving...
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % 
% 8.30/1.73  % clauses                               26
% 8.30/1.73  % conjectures                           1
% 8.30/1.73  % EPR                                   2
% 8.30/1.73  % Horn                                  26
% 8.30/1.73  % unary                                 26
% 8.30/1.73  % binary                                0
% 8.30/1.73  % lits                                  26
% 8.30/1.73  % lits eq                               26
% 8.30/1.73  % fd_pure                               0
% 8.30/1.73  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 8.30/1.73  % fd_cond                               0
% 8.30/1.73  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 8.30/1.73  % AC symbols                            2
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ 
% 8.30/1.73  % Current options:
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % ------ Proving...
% 8.30/1.73  % 
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.30/1.73  
% 8.30/1.73  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------