↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP188-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Pdhy4MwSRB true

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:35:58 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.27s 0.73s
% Output   : Refutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : GRP188-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Pdhy4MwSRB true
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:24:08 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.32  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.32  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.32  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.32  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.32  % Running in FO mode
% 0.54/0.58  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.54/0.58  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.54/0.58  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.00/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.00/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.00/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.00/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.00/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.00/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.00/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.27/0.73  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.27/0.73  % BCE start: 19
% 1.27/0.73  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.27/0.73  % PE start: 19
% 1.27/0.73  logic: eq
% 1.27/0.73  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.27/0.73  % done 27 iterations in 0.052s
% 1.27/0.73  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.27/0.73  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.27/0.73  thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(prove_p38a, conjecture,
% 1.27/0.73    (( least_upper_bound @ b @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) ) =
% 1.27/0.73     ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ))).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.27/0.73    (( least_upper_bound @ b @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) ) !=
% 1.27/0.73     ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b )),
% 1.27/0.73    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_p38a])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (((least_upper_bound @ b @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))
% 1.27/0.73         != (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 1.27/0.73    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.27/0.73         ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.27/0.73         ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (((least_upper_bound @ b @ (least_upper_bound @ b @ a))
% 1.27/0.73         != (least_upper_bound @ b @ a))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.27/0.73                [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(idempotence_of_lub, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ X @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (![X0 : $i]: ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X0) = (X0))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [idempotence_of_lub])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(associativity_of_lub, axiom,
% 1.27/0.73    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 1.27/0.73     ( least_upper_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.27/0.73         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.27/0.73           = (least_upper_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_lub])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl63, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.27/0.73         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.27/0.73           = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 1.27/0.73      (((least_upper_bound @ b @ a) != (least_upper_bound @ b @ a))),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl63])).
% 1.27/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain, ($false),
% 1.27/0.73      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118])).
% 1.27/0.73  
% 1.27/0.73  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.27/0.73  
% 1.27/0.73  
% 1.27/0.73  % Terminating...
% 1.40/0.79  % Runner terminated.
% 1.40/0.81  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------