%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP282-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:05:47 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 5.72s 1.13s % Output : CNFRefutation 5.72s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.12 % Problem : GRP282-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.04/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 01:03:23 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.19/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.19/0.37 # % 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 52 Number of unprocessed: 52 % 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.19/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.19/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.19/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.19/0.37 # 52 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.19/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 49 conjectures. % 0.19/0.37 # There are 49 start rule candidates: % 0.19/0.37 # Found 3 unit axioms. % 0.19/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.19/0.37 # 49 start rule tableaux created. % 0.19/0.37 # 49 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.19/0.37 # 3 unit axiom clauses % 0.19/0.37 % 0.19/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 3.28/0.83 # Creating equality axioms % 3.28/0.83 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 3.90/0.85 # Creating equality axioms % 3.90/0.85 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 3.90/0.86 # Creating equality axioms % 3.90/0.86 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 3.90/0.86 # Creating equality axioms % 3.90/0.86 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 3.90/0.86 # Creating equality axioms % 3.90/0.86 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 4.13/0.88 # Creating equality axioms % 4.13/0.88 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 4.13/0.89 # Creating equality axioms % 4.13/0.89 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 4.71/0.97 # Creating equality axioms % 4.71/0.97 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 5.72/1.13 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 5.72/1.13 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 5.72/1.13 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.72/1.13 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.72/1.13 # Begin clausification derivation % 5.72/1.13 % 5.72/1.13 # End clausification derivation % 5.72/1.13 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c6)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_102, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c6)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_82, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_90, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|inverse(sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_83, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_91, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c6)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_86, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c6)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c6)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_94, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c6)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c6)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c6,sk_c9)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c9|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_101, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c6)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_103, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c6,sk_c9)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c9|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c9|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c6)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c6,sk_c9)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_81, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c9|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c9|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_85, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c6)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_87, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c6,sk_c9)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c3)=sk_c8)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_88, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_89, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_92, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c5,sk_c6)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_93, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c5,sk_c6)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c9)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c6,sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_95, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c9)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c6,sk_c9)=sk_c7)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_104, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c9,multiply(X1,sk_c9))!=sk_c8|multiply(inverse(X2),sk_c9)!=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c9,sk_c8)!=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c9)!=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)!=sk_c9|multiply(X2,inverse(X2))!=sk_c7|multiply(X3,sk_c7)!=sk_c9|multiply(X4,sk_c9)!=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c9)!=sk_c7|inverse(X3)!=sk_c9|inverse(X1)!=sk_c9|inverse(X4)!=sk_c9)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_983, plain, (X7=X7)). % 5.72/1.13 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 5.72/1.13 # Begin printing tableau % 5.72/1.13 # Found 7 steps % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_983, plain, (identity=identity), inference(start_rule)). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_1100, plain, (identity=identity), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_987])). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_1218, plain, (multiply(identity,X2)!=X2), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_53])). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_1216, plain, (multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X2))=multiply(identity,X2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_986])). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_1333, plain, (multiply(identity,X2)!=X2), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_53])). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_1331, plain, (multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X2))=X2), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_988])). % 5.72/1.13 cnf(i_0_76550, plain, (inverse(multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X2)))=inverse(X2)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_76550, ...])). % 5.72/1.13 # End printing tableau % 5.72/1.13 # SZS output end % 5.72/1.13 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 5.72/1.13 # Child (2265) has found a proof. % 5.72/1.13 % 5.72/1.13 # Proof search is over... % 5.72/1.13 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------