%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP283-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:05:47 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 8.09s 1.40s % Output : CNFRefutation 8.09s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.12 % Problem : GRP283-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.04/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:39:17 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.20/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.20/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.20/0.37 # % 0.20/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.20/0.37 # Number of axioms: 40 Number of unprocessed: 40 % 0.20/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.20/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.20/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.20/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.20/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.20/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.20/0.37 # 40 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.20/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 37 conjectures. % 0.20/0.37 # There are 37 start rule candidates: % 0.20/0.37 # Found 3 unit axioms. % 0.20/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.20/0.37 # 37 start rule tableaux created. % 0.20/0.37 # 37 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.20/0.37 # 3 unit axiom clauses % 0.20/0.37 % 0.20/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 2.96/0.73 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.73 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 2.96/0.74 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.74 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 2.96/0.74 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.74 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 2.96/0.75 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.75 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 2.96/0.75 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.75 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 2.96/0.76 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.76 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 2.96/0.77 # Creating equality axioms % 2.96/0.77 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 3.31/0.77 # Creating equality axioms % 3.31/0.77 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 8.09/1.40 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 8.09/1.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 8.09/1.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 8.09/1.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 8.09/1.40 # Begin clausification derivation % 8.09/1.40 % 8.09/1.40 # End clausification derivation % 8.09/1.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (multiply(identity,X1)=X1)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (multiply(inverse(X1),X1)=identity)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c6|inverse(sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c3)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c8)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c8)=sk_c3|inverse(sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c6|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c3)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c8)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c8)=sk_c3|inverse(sk_c4)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c6|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,sk_c3)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c8)=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c8)=sk_c3|inverse(sk_c5)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c8)=sk_c6|inverse(sk_c1)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c8|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c8)=sk_c6|inverse(sk_c2)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c8)=sk_c6|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c3)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c8|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c3)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c5,sk_c8)=sk_c6|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c3)=sk_c7)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c8)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c8)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c8)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c8)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c4,sk_c7)=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c1,sk_c8)=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c5,sk_c8)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c2,sk_c8)=sk_c3|multiply(sk_c5,sk_c8)=sk_c6)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (multiply(sk_c8,multiply(X1,sk_c8))!=sk_c7|multiply(sk_c8,sk_c7)!=sk_c6|multiply(sk_c7,sk_c6)!=sk_c8|multiply(X2,sk_c8)!=sk_c6|multiply(X3,sk_c7)!=sk_c8|multiply(X4,sk_c8)!=sk_c7|inverse(sk_c7)!=sk_c6|inverse(X2)!=sk_c8|inverse(X3)!=sk_c7|inverse(X1)!=sk_c8|inverse(X4)!=sk_c8)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_2749, plain, (X6=X6)). % 8.09/1.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 8.09/1.40 # Begin printing tableau % 8.09/1.40 # Found 8 steps % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_2749, plain, (identity=identity), inference(start_rule)). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_2841, plain, (identity=identity), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2753])). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_2934, plain, (multiply(identity,X6)!=X6), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_2932, plain, (multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X6))=multiply(identity,X6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2752])). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_3024, plain, (multiply(identity,X6)!=X6), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_3022, plain, (multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X6))=X6), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2753])). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_99471, plain, (multiply(identity,X4)!=X4), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])). % 8.09/1.40 cnf(i_0_99469, plain, (multiply(multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X6)),multiply(identity,X4))=multiply(X6,X4)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_99469, ...])). % 8.09/1.40 # End printing tableau % 8.09/1.40 # SZS output end % 8.09/1.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 8.09/1.40 # Child (31634) has found a proof. % 8.09/1.40 % 8.09/1.40 # Proof search is over... % 8.09/1.40 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------