↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GRP415-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:26:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.94s 1.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (  17 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = multiply(X4,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X5,X4)),multiply(X5,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X4),X4))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(X3))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),X3)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X4,X2)),multiply(X4,inverse(inverse(X3))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))))))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X3))))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X3)))),multiply(X1,inverse(X4)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(multiply(X2,X3)))))) = multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X4,inverse(multiply(inverse(X3),X3)))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_3]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(X4))))))),X1)),X4)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = multiply(inverse(X3),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_8]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))) = multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X4,X2)),multiply(X4,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_3]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))))))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))))) = multiply(inverse(X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))),multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))) = multiply(inverse(X3),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    prove_these_axioms_1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : GRP415-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 18:35:56 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.94/1.94  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.94/1.94  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.94/1.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.94/1.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.94/1.95  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------