↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP417-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:39:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.97s 1.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  41 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (  40 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  105 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = multiply(X4,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X5,X4)),multiply(X5,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X4),X4))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(X3))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),X3)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X4,X2)),multiply(X4,inverse(inverse(X3))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))))))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X3))))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X3)))),multiply(X1,inverse(X4)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(multiply(X2,X3)))))) = multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X4,inverse(multiply(inverse(X3),X3)))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_3]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(X4))))))),X1)),X4)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))) = multiply(inverse(X3),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_8]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))) = multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X4,X2)),multiply(X4,X3))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_3]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))))))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)))))))) = multiply(inverse(X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))),multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))) = multiply(inverse(X3),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X3,multiply(X2,inverse(X4)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(X3)))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))))))))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),inverse(X1))))))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)),inverse(multiply(inverse(X3),X3)))))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(inverse(X2),X2))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_18]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))))))))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,X3))) = inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X4,X2)),multiply(X4,X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_11]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,X3)))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),X2)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,X3)) = multiply(inverse(multiply(X4,X2)),multiply(X4,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_22]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,X3))))) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,X3)) = multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X3),X2)),multiply(inverse(X4),X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)))),X1) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),multiply(inverse(X2),X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_30]),c_0_24]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1))) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(X1),X1)),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_32]),c_0_31]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_26]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP417-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:14:27 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.22  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.97/1.22  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.97/1.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % new_bool_1 with pid 90608 completed with status 9
% 3.97/1.22  % new_bool_3 with pid 90607 completed with status 9
% 3.97/1.22  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 90606 completed with status 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 3.97/1.22  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.97/1.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.97/1.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.97/1.22  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 3.97/1.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % new_bool_3 with pid 90615 completed with status 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 3.97/1.22  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.97/1.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.97/1.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.97/1.22  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 3.97/1.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.97/1.22  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 3.97/1.22  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.97/1.22  
% 3.97/1.22  % Proof found!
% 3.97/1.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.97/1.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.97/1.22  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 3.97/1.22  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Initial clauses                      : 2
% 3.97/1.22  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 3.97/1.22  % Processed clauses                    : 339
% 3.97/1.22  % ...of these trivial                  : 29
% 3.97/1.22  % ...subsumed                          : 231
% 3.97/1.22  % ...remaining for further processing  : 79
% 3.97/1.22  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 3.97/1.22  % Backward-rewritten                   : 48
% 3.97/1.22  % Generated clauses                    : 23396
% 3.97/1.22  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22521
% 3.97/1.22  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Paramodulations                      : 23396
% 3.97/1.22  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Total rewrite steps                  : 14737
% 3.97/1.22  % ...of those cached                   : 11500
% 3.97/1.22  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.97/1.22  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.97/1.22  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.97/1.22  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.97/1.22  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.97/1.22  % Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 3.97/1.22  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 3.97/1.22  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 3.97/1.22  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 3.97/1.22  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22150
% 3.97/1.22  % ...number of literals in the above   : 22150
% 3.97/1.22  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Current number of archived clauses   : 53
% 3.97/1.22  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 381
% 3.97/1.22  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 2050
% 3.97/1.22  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1067
% 3.97/1.22  % BW rewrite match successes           : 209
% 3.97/1.22  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.97/1.22  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1840541
% 3.97/1.22  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 3.97/1.22  
% 3.97/1.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.97/1.22  % User time                : 0.713 s
% 3.97/1.22  % System time              : 0.032 s
% 3.97/1.22  % Total time               : 0.745 s
% 3.97/1.22  % Maximum resident set size: 3380 pages
% 3.97/1.22  
% 3.97/1.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.97/1.22  % User time                : 3.644 s
% 3.97/1.22  % System time              : 0.187 s
% 3.97/1.22  % Total time               : 3.831 s
% 3.97/1.22  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 3.97/1.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------