↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP430-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:39:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  35 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (  34 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X1)))) = X4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X1)))) = X4,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)),inverse(multiply(X3,X4))),multiply(X5,inverse(X5))),multiply(X3,X1)))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,inverse(X3))),multiply(X4,X1)))) = multiply(multiply(multiply(X5,inverse(X5)),inverse(multiply(X2,X4))),multiply(X6,inverse(X6))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(multiply(X4,multiply(X5,inverse(X5))),multiply(X2,X3))))))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))) = multiply(multiply(X4,inverse(X4)),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X2,inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_6]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)),multiply(X3,inverse(X3))),multiply(X4,X1)))) = inverse(X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),multiply(X4,inverse(X4))))))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)))) = multiply(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)),multiply(X3,inverse(X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))),multiply(X3,X1)))) = inverse(X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))) = multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))),multiply(a1,inverse(a1))))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))),multiply(a1,inverse(a1))))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)))),multiply(a1,inverse(a1))) = multiply(a1,inverse(a1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(a1,inverse(a1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))),inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(a1,inverse(a1)))),X2))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))))) = multiply(a1,inverse(a1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_14]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))),multiply(a1,inverse(a1))) = inverse(inverse(multiply(a1,inverse(a1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),c_0_19]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_20]),c_0_11]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(X3)))))))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(a1,inverse(a1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,X3)))),inverse(multiply(X3,multiply(X4,inverse(X4))))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(X2))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X5))),multiply(multiply(multiply(X6,inverse(X6)),inverse(X4)),X1)))) = X5,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(X2))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = multiply(a1,inverse(a1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_31]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : GRP430-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:12:37 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.36  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 772904 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.36  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.36  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 772911 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Result found by U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.36  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.36  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.36  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.07/0.36  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.07/0.36  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.07/0.36  % Processed clauses                    : 148
% 0.07/0.36  % ...of these trivial                  : 24
% 0.07/0.36  % ...subsumed                          : 83
% 0.07/0.36  % ...remaining for further processing  : 41
% 0.07/0.36  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.07/0.36  % Backward-rewritten                   : 19
% 0.07/0.36  % Generated clauses                    : 1935
% 0.07/0.36  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1605
% 0.07/0.36  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Paramodulations                      : 1935
% 0.07/0.36  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Total rewrite steps                  : 882
% 0.07/0.36  % ...of those cached                   : 612
% 0.07/0.36  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.07/0.36  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.07/0.36  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.07/0.36  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1421
% 0.07/0.36  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1421
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of archived clauses   : 22
% 0.07/0.36  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.07/0.36  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 207
% 0.07/0.36  % BW rewrite match successes           : 38
% 0.07/0.36  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 33417
% 0.07/0.36  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.36  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.07/0.36  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.36  % User time                : 0.072 s
% 0.07/0.36  % System time              : 0.024 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Total time               : 0.096 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.36  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------