↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP436-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:43:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.57s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   23
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  44 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (  43 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  154 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X1))))) = X4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X1))))) = X4,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(X3,X4))),inverse(X5))),multiply(X5,multiply(X3,X1))))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,inverse(X4))),multiply(X4,multiply(X5,X1))))) = multiply(X6,multiply(multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(multiply(X3,X5))),inverse(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,multiply(X4,inverse(X5))),multiply(X5,multiply(X2,X3)))))))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X4,inverse(X2)))))),X3))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X4,X1))))) = multiply(inverse(X5),inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X4,inverse(X5)))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X4,X2))))),X3))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(X3,X4))),X3))),inverse(X2))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X4,X1))))) = multiply(X5,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X4,X5))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(X3)),inverse(X4))),multiply(X4,multiply(X5,X1))))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(X6,multiply(multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(multiply(X7,X3))),inverse(X8))),multiply(X8,multiply(X7,X5)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(X3,X4))),X3))) = multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(X5,X4))),X5))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(X4)),inverse(X5))),multiply(X5,multiply(X1,X2)))))) = X4,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),X2)) = inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X4,X3))),X4)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_12]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(X4))) = multiply(X5,multiply(multiply(inverse(X5),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),inverse(X4))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(multiply(inverse(X2),inverse(multiply(X3,X1))),multiply(inverse(X4),inverse(multiply(X5,X6))))))),inverse(multiply(X6,multiply(X4,X3)))) = X5,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),X2) = multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X4,X3))),X4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)),inverse(X3))) = multiply(X4,multiply(multiply(inverse(X4),inverse(X2)),inverse(X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X4))))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2))) = multiply(X3,multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)),X2) = multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X3)),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X2,inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)),X2) = multiply(multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X4))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X4,multiply(X5,multiply(X2,X3)))))))),inverse(X5))) = X4,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2))),inverse(X3)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(X2),multiply(X3,multiply(inverse(X3),X1))))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_24]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X2),multiply(X3,inverse(X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X5)))),multiply(X6,multiply(multiply(inverse(X6),inverse(X4)),X1))))) = X5,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = multiply(X3,multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(inverse(X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(inverse(X2)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_29]),c_0_28]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(X4)),inverse(X1)))))),X2)) = inverse(X4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_30]),c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(X4)),X1))))),X2)) = inverse(X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)),X2) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_34]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(X4)),X1))))),X2) = X4,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_35]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_36]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_34]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_42]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRP436-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:15:46 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/0.68  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.57/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.57/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1612531 completed with status 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 1.57/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.57/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.57/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.57/0.68  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 1.57/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1612536 completed with status 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.57/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.57/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.57/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.57/0.68  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 1.57/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.57/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.57/0.68  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.57/0.68  
% 1.57/0.68  % Proof found!
% 1.57/0.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.57/0.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.57/0.68  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 1.57/0.68  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Initial clauses                      : 2
% 1.57/0.68  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 1.57/0.68  % Processed clauses                    : 273
% 1.57/0.68  % ...of these trivial                  : 36
% 1.57/0.68  % ...subsumed                          : 159
% 1.57/0.68  % ...remaining for further processing  : 78
% 1.57/0.68  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 1.57/0.68  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 1.57/0.68  % Generated clauses                    : 19685
% 1.57/0.68  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18913
% 1.57/0.68  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Paramodulations                      : 19685
% 1.57/0.68  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2497
% 1.57/0.68  % ...of those cached                   : 1334
% 1.57/0.68  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.57/0.68  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.57/0.68  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.57/0.68  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.57/0.68  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.57/0.68  % Current number of processed clauses  : 58
% 1.57/0.68  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 1.57/0.68  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 15
% 1.57/0.68  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 1.57/0.68  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18414
% 1.57/0.68  % ...number of literals in the above   : 18414
% 1.57/0.68  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 1.57/0.68  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 409
% 1.57/0.68  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1049
% 1.57/0.68  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1384
% 1.57/0.68  % BW rewrite match successes           : 117
% 1.57/0.68  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.57/0.68  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 525142
% 1.57/0.68  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 1.57/0.68  
% 1.57/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.57/0.68  % User time                : 0.223 s
% 1.57/0.68  % System time              : 0.022 s
% 1.57/0.68  % Total time               : 0.245 s
% 1.57/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 1.57/0.68  
% 1.57/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.57/0.68  % User time                : 0.965 s
% 1.57/0.68  % System time              : 0.082 s
% 1.57/0.68  % Total time               : 1.048 s
% 1.57/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.57/0.68  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------