%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP438-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:06:28 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 1.55s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.37s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GRP438-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0. % 0.13/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 21:24:32 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.19/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.19/0.37 # % 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2 % 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.72/0.91 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.72/0.91 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.72/0.91 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.72/0.91 # 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.72/0.91 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.72/0.91 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.72/0.91 # Found 2 unit axioms. % 0.72/0.91 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.72/0.91 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.72/0.91 # 2 unit axiom clauses % 0.72/0.91 % 0.72/0.91 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.72/0.91 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.72/0.91 # Creating equality axioms % 0.72/0.91 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 1.37/1.55 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 1.37/1.55 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 1.37/1.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.37/1.55 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.37/1.55 # Begin clausification derivation % 1.37/1.55 % 1.37/1.55 # End clausification derivation % 1.37/1.55 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X1)))))=X4)). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)))). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X5=X5)). % 1.37/1.55 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 1.37/1.55 # Begin printing tableau % 1.37/1.55 # Found 6 steps % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24)))))=multiply(b3,c3)), inference(start_rule)). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24)))))=multiply(b3,c3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(X28,multiply(X27,multiply(multiply(inverse(X27),inverse(multiply(a3,X28))),X29)))))!=a3), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (multiply(multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(X28,multiply(X27,multiply(multiply(inverse(X27),inverse(multiply(a3,X28))),X29))))),multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24))))))=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). % 1.37/1.55 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(X28,multiply(X27,multiply(multiply(inverse(X27),inverse(multiply(a3,X28))),X29))))),multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_32, ...])). % 1.37/1.55 # End printing tableau % 1.37/1.55 # SZS output end % 1.37/1.55 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 1.37/1.55 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 1.37/1.55 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on % 1.37/1.55 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 1.37/1.55 # Proof search is over... % 1.37/1.55 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------