↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP451-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NKTmEjBHlJ true

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:36:28 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.67s 0.71s
% Output   : Refutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem  : GRP451-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NKTmEjBHlJ true
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:17:23 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.30  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.30  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.30  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.31  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.31  % Running in FO mode
% 0.47/0.56  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.47/0.56  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.47/0.56  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.67/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.67/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.67/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.67/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.67/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.67/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.67/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.67/0.71  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.67/0.71  % BCE start: 4
% 0.67/0.71  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.67/0.71  % PE start: 4
% 0.67/0.71  logic: eq
% 0.67/0.71  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.67/0.71  % done 13 iterations in 0.023s
% 0.67/0.71  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.67/0.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.67/0.71  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(b1_type, type, b1: $i).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(a1_type, type, a1: $i).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(divide_type, type, divide: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(inverse_type, type, inverse: $i > $i).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(inverse, axiom, (( inverse @ A ) = ( divide @ ( divide @ B @ B ) @ A ))).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(single_axiom, axiom,
% 0.67/0.71    (( divide @
% 0.67/0.71       ( divide @
% 0.67/0.71         ( divide @ A @ A ) @ 
% 0.67/0.71         ( divide @
% 0.67/0.71           A @ 
% 0.67/0.71           ( divide @ B @ ( divide @ ( divide @ ( divide @ A @ A ) @ A ) @ C ) ) ) ) @ 
% 0.67/0.71       C ) =
% 0.67/0.71     ( B ))).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ 
% 0.67/0.71           (divide @ (divide @ X1 @ X1) @ 
% 0.67/0.71            (divide @ X1 @ 
% 0.67/0.71             (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ (divide @ (divide @ X1 @ X1) @ X1) @ X2)))) @ 
% 0.67/0.71           X2) = (X0))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [single_axiom])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ 
% 0.67/0.71           (inverse @ 
% 0.67/0.71            (divide @ X1 @ (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ (inverse @ X1) @ X2)))) @ 
% 0.67/0.71           X2) = (X0))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.67/0.71                [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ 
% 0.67/0.71           (inverse @ 
% 0.67/0.71            (inverse @ 
% 0.67/0.71             (divide @ X2 @ (divide @ (inverse @ (divide @ X1 @ X1)) @ X0)))) @ 
% 0.67/0.71           X0) = (X2))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (inverse @ (divide @ X0 @ X0)) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ (inverse @ (inverse @ (divide @ X2 @ (inverse @ X0)))) @ X0)
% 0.67/0.71           = (X2))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ (inverse @ (inverse @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)))) @ X0)
% 0.67/0.71           = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ (inverse @ (inverse @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)))) @ X0)
% 0.67/0.71           = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ X0) = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl38, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(prove_these_axioms_1, conjecture,
% 0.67/0.71    (( multiply @ ( inverse @ a1 ) @ a1 ) =
% 0.67/0.71     ( multiply @ ( inverse @ b1 ) @ b1 ))).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.67/0.71    (( multiply @ ( inverse @ a1 ) @ a1 ) !=
% 0.67/0.71     ( multiply @ ( inverse @ b1 ) @ b1 )),
% 0.67/0.71    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_these_axioms_1])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (((multiply @ (inverse @ a1) @ a1) != (multiply @ (inverse @ b1) @ b1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(multiply, axiom,
% 0.67/0.71    (( multiply @ A @ B ) =
% 0.67/0.71     ( divide @ A @ ( divide @ ( divide @ C @ C ) @ B ) ))).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((multiply @ X0 @ X2)
% 0.67/0.71           = (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ (divide @ X1 @ X1) @ X2)))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [multiply])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((inverse @ X1) = (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [inverse])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((multiply @ X0 @ X2) = (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X2)))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((multiply @ X0 @ X2) = (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X2)))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (((divide @ (inverse @ a1) @ (inverse @ a1))
% 0.67/0.71         != (divide @ (inverse @ b1) @ (inverse @ b1)))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.67/0.71                [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl33])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl88, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.67/0.71         ((divide @ (inverse @ a1) @ (inverse @ a1)) != (divide @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl56, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain,
% 0.67/0.71      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ X0) = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl38, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.67/0.71  thf(zip_derived_cl106, plain, ($false),
% 0.67/0.71      inference('simplify_reflect+', [status(thm)],
% 0.67/0.71                [zip_derived_cl88, zip_derived_cl56])).
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  
% 0.67/0.71  % Terminating...
% 1.68/0.78  % Runner terminated.
% 1.68/0.79  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------