%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem : GRP463-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:41:51 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 29 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(A,B) = divide(A,divide(identity,B)),
file('theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(A) = divide(identity,A),
file('theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).
cnf(identity,axiom,
identity = divide(A,A),
file('theBenchmark.p',identity) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
file('theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).
cnf(equality_1,axiom,
Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).
cnf(equality_2,axiom,
( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
| Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).
cnf(equality_3,axiom,
( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
| Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
| Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).
cnf(equality_4,axiom,
( divide(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1) = divide(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
| Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
| Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).
cnf(t1,plain,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_these_axioms_1]) ).
cnf(t2,plain,
( divide(inverse(a1),divide(identity,a1)) != identity
| multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != divide(inverse(a1),divide(identity,a1))
| multiply(inverse(a1),a1) = identity ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_3]) ).
cnf(t3,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).
cnf(t4,plain,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) = divide(inverse(a1),divide(identity,a1)),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[multiply]) ).
cnf(t5,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).
cnf(t6,plain,
( divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)) != identity
| divide(inverse(a1),divide(identity,a1)) != divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1))
| divide(inverse(a1),divide(identity,a1)) = identity ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[equality_3]) ).
cnf(t7,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).
cnf(t8,plain,
( divide(identity,a1) != divide(identity,a1)
| inverse(a1) != divide(identity,a1)
| divide(inverse(a1),divide(identity,a1)) = divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[equality_4]) ).
cnf(t9,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).
cnf(t10,plain,
inverse(a1) = divide(identity,a1),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[inverse]) ).
cnf(t11,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).
cnf(t12,plain,
divide(identity,a1) = divide(identity,a1),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:3)],[equality_1]) ).
cnf(t13,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t8:3]) ).
cnf(t14,plain,
( identity != divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1))
| divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)) = identity ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:3)],[equality_2]) ).
cnf(t15,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t6:3]) ).
cnf(t16,plain,
identity = divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t14:2)],[identity]) ).
cnf(t17,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t14:2]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GRP463-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.03 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 09:37:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------